2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 4 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.50 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 4 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3.08 | 3.38 | 3.50 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 2.69 | 2.38 | 2.50 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 3 | 7 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3.12 | 3.75 | 3.00 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 2 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3.64 | 3.75 | 3.17 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 7 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3.62 | 3.67 | 3.50 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 3.00 | 3.88 | 2.50 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2.80 | 3.33 | 2.83 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 6 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.73 | 3.67 | 3.17 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 2.67 | 3.25 | 2.83 |