2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promote an environment for scholarly excellence. | 13 | 17 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3.71 |
| Q2 | consult the librarians adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 2.92 |
| Q3 | make excellent administrative appointments. | 7 | 10 | 23 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3.13 |
| Q4 | foster a fair and rigorous promotion process. | 12 | 28 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3.98 |
| Q5 | effectively represent the interests of the library to senior administrators. | 12 | 16 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 3.72 |
| Q6 | are attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the library. | 18 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 3.97 |
| Q7 | manage the library's resources well. | 9 | 14 | 15 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 3.23 |
| Q8 | successfully raise funds to support the mission of the library. | 3 | 11 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 3.22 |
| Q9 | inspire confidence in leadership overall. | 7 | 15 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 3.00 |