2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.83 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.25 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.00 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.25 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.17 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.30 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4.75 | ||
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.10 |