2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 5 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.09 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 3 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3.85 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3.80 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.50 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4.07 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3.62 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 7 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4.22 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3.80 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3.60 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3.92 |