2008 evaluation results

General Administration Issues


Separate reports by faculty group


SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)309794138234211.95
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.68142100120151332.69
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.113496161247621.67
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition3711093157184312.18
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1311649495117153.44
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.161185807765483.84
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 962458755301013.84
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.4418615511765463.15
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)521411061081041012.91
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.2351871331551592.02
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.841591208371933.37
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)2663100152236381.85
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.951822168513263.41
Response rate: 19%     Responded 621     Eligible 3298  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)121320329241.42
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.73618436261.99
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.412244264251.71
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition3150322621133.52
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 6364217974.20
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.284039322683.13
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 335623172413.92
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.1663422713113.46
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)637362518503.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.35372420822.51
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.193636115653.54
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)719193866211.72
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.336742132163.82
Response rate: 14%     Responded 173     Eligible 1277  

Separate reports by campus

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)40108112167295221.90
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.74171114153195372.55
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.1345118190294801.69
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition61150117176198402.37
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 180208110101126193.62
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.18021511210183553.73
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 12528310670321273.85
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.5923518513576523.22
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)571711341251181372.94
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.25551181511742142.08
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.10119014694761323.41
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)3273114183290511.81
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1212282469715403.48
Response rate: 18%     Responded 751     Eligible 4119  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)10032321.09
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.13371221.64
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.10191521.37
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition4863533.33
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 91521024.20
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.4865513.17
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 311320103.91
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.1895243.11
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)12672102.50
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.10531182.70
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.11900183.11
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)1336871.92
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.41391023.77
Response rate: 13%     Responded 29     Eligible 217  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1220811.31
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0413601.83
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.1114252.12
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition3224212.75
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 5530014.20
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.5213303.50
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 1710054.00
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0634013.33
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)0521243.50
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0113092.33
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.1410084.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0621413.25
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.3830004.00
Response rate: 6%     Responded 14     Eligible 239  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)309794138234211.95
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.68142100120151332.69
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.113496161247621.67
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition3711093157184312.18
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1311649495117153.44
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.161185807765483.84
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 962458755301013.84
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.4418615511765463.15
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)521411061081041012.91
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.2351871331551592.02
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.841591208371933.37
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)2663100152236381.85
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.951822168513263.41
Response rate: 19%     Responded 621     Eligible 3298  

Separate reports by faculty unit

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0103301.67
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0213102.33
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0112212.00
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0104201.88
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1321003.67
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.2122003.25
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 0301033.83
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0024102.12
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)0231103.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0111222.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.1311013.83
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)1012301.75
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1420003.88
Response rate: 11%     Responded 7     Eligible 65  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)10021821.08
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1335821.90
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.10181021.50
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition4733333.64
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 71220024.21
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.4554413.10
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 31021074.00
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.1854233.30
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)1056292.33
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.10421152.75
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.10600163.08
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)1335831.90
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.31170023.82
Response rate: 16%     Responded 23     Eligible 148  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)000000  
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.000000  
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.000000  
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition000000  
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 000000  
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.000000  
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 000000  
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.000000  
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)000000  
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.000000  
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.000000  
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)000000  
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.000000  
Response rate: 0%     Responded 0     Eligible 14  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)7815174751.50
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.112217172662.71
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.23112347111.41
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition61228232732.41
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 212712132333.50
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.212117191383.29
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 1548194393.89
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.73727131233.35
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)819221821122.73
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.412112033201.85
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.1012172524102.30
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)3920263651.92
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.18174313273.23
Response rate: 22%     Responded 100     Eligible 447  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1020274510061.52
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1333284475151.99
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.563341102211.42
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition1738253978122.03
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 724922253743.88
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.3143424038152.95
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 508430207183.96
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.247546352453.43
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)1744324247252.56
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.815433765402.01
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.3460312525333.61
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)716294492191.55
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.396466203173.61
Response rate: 16%     Responded 210     Eligible 1304  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0032002.67
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0212003.00
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0101211.50
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0110301.33
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 2100204.00
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.4100004.88
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 0310013.83
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.1201103.75
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)1220003.75
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0001221.25
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.0012012.25
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)1002201.75
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1121003.25
Response rate: 10%     Responded 5     Eligible 49  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0001201.25
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0001201.25
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0001201.25
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0110103.00
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1200004.25
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.0210003.75
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 0101013.00
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0030003.00
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)0111003.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0010023.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.0030003.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)000002  
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.0210003.75
Response rate: 13%     Responded 3     Eligible 23  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0000301.00
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0001201.25
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0000301.00
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0020102.75
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1101004.00
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.0101102.00
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 0010023.00
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0011012.50
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)0100014.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0001012.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.0100024.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0001022.00
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1011003.00
Response rate: 9%     Responded 3     Eligible 32  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1013202.00
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1121202.75
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0003221.67
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0122112.50
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1202202.25
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.1301203.67
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 1111212.50
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.1311103.67
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)1501004.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.2201114.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.2300014.33
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0003401.38
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.3111014.50
Response rate: 18%     Responded 7     Eligible 40  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1220811.31
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0413601.83
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.1114252.12
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition3224212.75
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 5530014.20
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.5213303.50
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 1710054.00
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0634013.33
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)0521243.50
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0113092.33
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.1410084.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0621413.25
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.3830004.00
Response rate: 6%     Responded 14     Eligible 239  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1100104.00
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1000103.00
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0000121.00
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0001111.50
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 0110103.00
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.0210003.75
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 0300004.00
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0210003.75
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)000003  
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.000003  
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.0100024.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0102002.25
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1002002.25
Response rate: 5%     Responded 3     Eligible 66  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)15451511.50
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.4848522.88
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.02371361.46
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition03311851.91
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 9855213.81
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.101320064.31
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 01120262.50
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.04850132.94
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)16652103.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.00461192.25
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.26840113.25
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)033111221.73
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.29125023.25
Response rate: 30%     Responded 31     Eligible 105  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1101103.00
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1200104.00
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0020112.75
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition1100014.50
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1020013.25
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.2200004.50
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 1100114.00
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0111013.00
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)0100122.50
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0000131.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.2000025.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0000311.00
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1021003.00
Response rate: 20%     Responded 4     Eligible 20  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)64129435842.21
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.234832383552.97
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.31330606391.86
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition145227463382.76
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 356625331843.69
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.67672162174.28
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 1759272113453.63
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.950523118213.10
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)838382423502.99
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.25254735621.97
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.1551451213433.46
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)82331456591.97
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.26586027653.42
Response rate: 19%     Responded 182     Eligible 971  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0011211.50
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0202102.25
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0110212.00
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0201202.00
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 3100104.67
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.1210103.75
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 0130013.17
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0202102.25
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)0310013.83
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.1020113.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.2120004.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0100221.25
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1130003.33
Response rate: 7%     Responded 5     Eligible 71  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)4451912.80
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.2734712.67
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0324961.50
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition3525722.30
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1653722.70
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.4716513.00
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 8623054.25
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.2169322.33
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)3342483.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.12262102.25
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.2356352.60
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)3533642.83
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1973133.43
Response rate: 15%     Responded 24     Eligible 161  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)4694613.00
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.5943723.50
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.25571012.14
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition7783503.38
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 9871413.81
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.141021124.50
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 31266033.62
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.21184223.44
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)3974163.50
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.13563122.50
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.5585073.31
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)24311822.05
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.61454013.89
Response rate: 27%     Responded 30     Eligible 111  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1119621.83
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1713533.00
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0254722.00
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition1636222.83
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 3124911.62
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.5650403.67
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 41321004.04
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.21232103.83
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)2805313.62
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.1533343.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.3573113.29
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)2356402.50
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.2558002.90
Response rate: 21%     Responded 21     Eligible 98  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)2212402.25
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.2123302.33
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0113242.00
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition2251103.20
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1240402.88
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.5121024.60
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 3401124.12
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.1325002.75
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)3123113.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.1203232.17
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.1511123.80
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0131422.00
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.0441023.38
Response rate: 24%     Responded 11     Eligible 45  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)036101601.65
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.46611802.36
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.013111551.50
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition244131012.00
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 101371313.96
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.2959912.39
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 71542343.93
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.51277313.50
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)01555643.40
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.04489101.94
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.41276243.54
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)02391921.37
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.71672123.91
Response rate: 24%     Responded 35     Eligible 145  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0323302.33
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1422203.25
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0124401.88
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition2115202.20
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1322302.75
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.1506003.00
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 3422003.88
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.2612103.83
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)1131502.00
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0122511.50
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.3401303.88
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0024421.75
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1252103.00
Response rate: 26%     Responded 12     Eligible 47  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1413701.83
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.1624303.00
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0346212.42
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition2403701.83
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 1523502.50
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.1842013.69
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 2634013.58
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.1264302.67
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)2731033.86
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0151362.70
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.7121144.64
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)2222711.75
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.4750003.93
Response rate: 18%     Responded 16     Eligible 90  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)1349812.00
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.3654622.90
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.10105642.50
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition2737612.43
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 6745213.64
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.6944303.72
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 71021224.10
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0676422.71
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)5557223.10
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.3265452.67
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.41270203.79
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)11761001.92
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.66121103.42
Response rate: 19%     Responded 26     Eligible 140  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0101102.00
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0010112.00
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0111003.00
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition0201003.75
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 0110103.00
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.1110004.00
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 0110013.50
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.0210003.75
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)1001013.50
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.1000025.00
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.0020013.00
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)0011102.00
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.0210003.75
Response rate: 13%     Responded 3     Eligible 23  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)0415402.10
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.0424502.12
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.0137222.14
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition1144322.38
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 2443203.12
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.2214512.00
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 4801024.19
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.2443113.25
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)1105072.20
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.0033182.33
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.4601044.25
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)2214502.00
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.1635003.33
Response rate: 19%     Responded 15     Eligible 79  
SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost), which could lead to an additional average employee contribution of as much as $1000 yearly.   University record story (external link)000000  
Q2I support an administration proposal to implement mandatory vesting and/or waiting periods before any university contributions to the University Retirement Savings Plan accrue to new employees.000000  
Q3Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1 and Q2.000000  
Q4I support the continued growth in non-tenure-track faculty relative to tenure-track faculty.   Ann Arbor Campus Faculty Composition000000  
Q5I support exploring the formation of a collective-bargaining unit for university faculty to resist the erosion of faculty benefits. 000000  
Q6I approve the change from paper-based to web-based student evaluation of instructors that is being implemented for all courses this semester.000000  
Q7In my unit, student responses on course evaluations are given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions. 000000  
Q8Narrative responses from students made as part of on-line course evaluations should be given significant weight in tenure, promotion, and merit decisions.000000  
Q9I support the Rackham proposal to encourage continuity of graduate enrollment via increased re-enrollment fees after terms of absence.   Rackham proposal (external link)000000  
Q10Faculty were adequately consulted in formulating the proposal from Rackham described in Q9.000000  
Q11The Rackham School of Graduate Studies adds value to U-M graduate education that cannot be achieved within individual schools and colleges.000000  
Q12I believe that faculty members of the Advisory Board on Intercollegiate Athletics should continue to be offered reimbursement for airfare, hotel accommodations, tickets, and meal per diem to attend Michigan Bowl games.   University Audits Memo (PDF file)000000  
Q13Faculty should have more options for investing their University Retirement Savings Plan contributions than exist now.000000  
Response rate: 0%     Responded 0     Eligible 42  

Combined report for all faculty

Notes on reporting

Back to 2008 results

Back to AEC home