2008 evaluation results

General Administration Issues, Dearborn


Separate reports by faculty group


SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).04585811.15
Q2Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.064174721.29
Q3I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.18171371923.35
Q4I support the expansion of on-line courses.192314101003.67
Q5The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.314142311112.43
Q6Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.2728123234.18
Q7The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.21213281652.20
Q8There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.51621161442.79
Response rate: 27%     Responded 76     Eligible 281  
*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).01162531.16
Q2Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.12082141.26
Q3I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.7878613.07
Q4I support the expansion of on-line courses.9975423.61
Q5The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.08573112.80
Q6Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.101840044.17
Q7The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.131413143.00
Q8There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.111742113.43
Response rate: 17%     Responded 37     Eligible 217  
*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty

Separate reports by faculty unit

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).03494521.18
Q2Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.141124141.22
Q3I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.16106121822.67
Q4I support the expansion of on-line courses.13141412913.21
Q5The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.1912188132.39
Q6Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.232690144.25
Q7The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.28171410122.59
Q8There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.21617106123.06
Response rate: 22%     Responded 64     Eligible 286  
*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).01101001.10
Q2Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.0212611.42
Q3I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.1440213.38
Q4I support the expansion of on-line courses.4431004.00
Q5The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.0424112.75
Q6Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.3521014.00
Q7The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.0214411.88
Q8There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.1214312.12
Response rate: 15%     Responded 12     Eligible 78  
*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).0001211.25
Q2Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.0002201.50
Q3I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.1300004.17
Q4I support the expansion of on-line courses.2110004.50
Q5The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.0011022.50
Q6Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.2100004.75
Q7The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.0100211.25
Q8There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.0030102.83
Response rate: 25%     Responded 4     Eligible 16  
*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).00031011.15
Q2Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.00031011.15
Q3I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.4162103.17
Q4I support the expansion of on-line courses.4531103.90
Q5The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.1405222.30
Q6Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.6601104.33
Q7The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.0153232.60
Q8There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.1622213.58
Response rate: 28%     Responded 14     Eligible 50  
*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty

SAANDSDNBJ2008
median
Q1I support pending changes to faculty and staff benefits packages, including the plan to increase the employee share of co-premium costs by 50% on average (from 20% of total cost at present to 30% of total cost).01111601.09
Q2Faculty were adequately consulted about the proposed changes in Q1.0226901.58
Q3I support the on-line administration of student teaching evaluations.3741403.57
Q4I support the expansion of on-line courses.5801414.00
Q5The resources available to promote student retention are adequate.1542343.12
Q6Experiential learning opportunities should be widely available to all students.3851023.81
Q7The level of faculty engagement in events outside their unit is satisfactory.1348122.44
Q8There is a satisfactory level of campus effort toward achieving the metropolitan vision.2354412.70
Response rate: 28%     Responded 19     Eligible 68  
*medians from 2005 and 2004 computed only from Ann Arbor campus University Senate faculty


Combined report for all faculty

Notes on reporting

Back to 2008 results

Back to AEC home