Administration Evaluation

Chancellor, University of Michigan - Dearborn, Daniel Little

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

separate reports by unit

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2008/09 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median	AY2004/05 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	20	24	25	9	11	5	3.48	3.79	3.59	3.71	3.65	3.68
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	18	24	24	10	12	6	3.42	3.67	3.63	3.51	3.69	3.57
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	10	11	24	22	20	7	2.56	2.62	2.72	2.43	2.63	1.98
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	7	12	23	17	26	9	2.47	2.80	2.62	3.00	2.97	2.69
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	23	26	19	9	8	9	3.75	3.93	3.65	3.81	3.83	3.32
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	23	25	17	13	11	5	3.64	3.74	3.72	3.72	3.70	3.51
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	11	27	8	13	12	22	3.59	3.45	3.32	3.67	3.20	3.06
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	18	23	24	10	16	3	3.31	3.53	3.27	3.30	3.33	2.78

Response rate: 16% Responded 94 Eligible 575 (301 Senate, 274 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2008/09 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median	AY2004/05 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	15	18	23	9	10	5	3.30	3.71	3.58	3.57	3.54	3.62
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	13	19	22	9	11	6	3.27	3.63	3.71	3.52	3.68	3.57
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	8	9	20	20	18	5	2.48	2.63	2.77	2.50	2.45	1.95
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	5	10	19	16	24	6	2.31	2.78	2.55	2.91	2.91	2.62
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	18	23	18	6	7	8	3.72	3.97	3.74	3.80	3.82	3.25
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	18	21	16	11	10	4	3.55	3.70	3.73	3.67	3.63	3.43
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	9	23	6	11	11	19	3.59	3.41	3.41	3.43	3.00	2.96
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	15	18	21	9	14	3	3.24	3.46	3.29	3.37	3.28	2.57

Response rate: 27% Responded 80 Eligible 301

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2008/09 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median	AY2004/05 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	5	6	2	0	1	0	4.17	4.00	3.60	3.93	3.93	3.83
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	5	5	2	1	1	0	4.10	3.79	3.22	3.50	3.71	3.57
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	2	4	2	2	2	3.00	2.58	2.57	2.33	3.14	2.04
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	2	2	4	1	2	3	3.12	2.93	2.78	3.21	3.19	2.88
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	5	3	1	3	1	1	4.00	3.78	3.08	3.81	3.90	3.50
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	5	4	1	2	1	1	4.12	3.83	3.70	3.79	3.88	3.62
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	2	4	2	2	1	3	3.62	3.60	3.08	4.05	3.60	3.25
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	3	5	3	1	2	0	3.70	3.69	3.25	3.19	3.44	3.43

Response rate: 5% Responded 14 Eligible 274

Separate reports by unit

College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2008/09 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median	AY2004/05 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	12	15	19	4	4	2	3.50	3.81	3.44	3.74	3.61	3.73
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	12	13	18	5	6	2	3.39	3.62	3.39	3.39	3.54	3.39
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	5	6	17	16	8	4	2.62	2.50	2.79	2.15	2.50	1.80
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	3	8	14	14	11	6	2.50	2.70	2.77	2.92	2.98	2.65
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	12	15	14	7	3	5	3.60	3.84	3.56	3.67	3.85	3.55
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	13	17	10	7	5	4	3.74	3.75	3.80	3.68	3.73	3.64
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	6	17	4	8	3	18	3.74	3.43	3.55	3.79	3.50	3.38
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	9	17	16	5	8	1	3.41	3.55	3.27	3.19	3.36	2.79

Response rate: 16% Responded 56 Eligible 342

College of Engineering and Computer Science

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2008/09 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median	AY2004/05 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	2	2	3	2	1	0	3.17	3.33	3.89	4.60	3.57	3.19
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	1	5	1	2	1	0	3.70	3.42	4.00	4.25	3.85	3.79
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	2	1	4	1	0	2.50	2.67	3.38	4.25	2.38	2.38
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	1	1	1	3	4	0	1.83	2.50	2.10	3.88	2.33	2.75
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	3	3	2	1	0	1	4.00	3.83	4.07	4.75	3.81	2.33
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	3	1	2	3	1	0	3.00	3.25	3.50	4.67	3.00	2.60
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	1	3	1	2	3	0	2.50	3.50	3.69	4.25	2.12	2.86
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	3	1	2	3	1	0	3.00	3.17	3.50	4.17	3.25	2.71

Response rate: 11% Responded 10 Eligible 92

Dearborn College of Business

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2008/09 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median	AY2004/05 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	4	2	0	2	4	2	3.00	3.90	3.69	3.67	3.30	3.00
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3	3	0	2	3	3	3.67	4.00	3.58	3.50	3.69	3.38
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	0	4	1	5	2	2.50	3.20	2.50	3.00	2.88	1.88
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	1	2	4	0	5	2	2.75	3.12	3.00	3.33	3.08	2.67
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	4	5	0	0	4	1	4.00	4.50	3.64	3.80	3.57	3.67
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	4	4	1	1	3	1	3.88	4.00	3.71	3.86	3.57	3.38
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	1	3	1	2	4	2	2.25	3.00	2.67	3.25	2.67	2.40
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	1	4	3	1	4	1	3.00	3.38	3.56	3.64	2.92	2.62

Response rate: 19% Responded 14 Eligible 74

Dearborn School of Education

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2011/12 median	AY2010/11 median	AY2009/10 median	AY2008/09 median	AY2007/08 median	AY2006/07 median	AY2005/06 median	AY2004/05 median
Q1	actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	2	3	3	1	1	1	3.50	3.95	3.69	3.42	4.25	3.90
Q2	actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2	2	4	1	1	1	3.25	3.86	3.78	3.40	4.08	3.64
Q3	consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1	2	1	1	5	1	1.50	2.70	1.83	2.62	3.00	2.00
Q4	makes excellent administrative appointments.	2	1	2	0	5	1	2.00	3.12	1.75	3.00	3.25	2.50
Q5	effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials.	4	2	2	1	0	2	4.25	4.25	3.70	3.93	4.14	3.00
Q6	is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus.	3	2	3	2	1	0	3.33	3.93	3.75	3.71	4.17	3.17
Q7	successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus.	3	4	1	1	1	1	4.00	4.00	3.00	3.86	3.83	2.90
Q8	inspires confidence in leadership overall.	4	1	2	1	2	1	3.50	3.75	3.33	3.20	3.90	2.50

Response rate: 21% Responded 11 Eligible 53

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2011/2012 results

Back to AEC home