Administration Evaluation

Dean, Rackham Graduate School, Carol Fierke

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	39	95	47	42	34	108	3.56	3.53
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	52	106	50	27	29	100	3.75	3.72
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	50	85	46	60	23	101	3.54	3.38
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	35	79	50	75	27	99	3.12	3.02
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	42	96	54	52	28	92	3.52	3.46
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	45	96	54	47	28	95	3.56	3.51
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	16	21	37	32	34	224	2.61	2.30
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	14	16	33	35	30	232	2.47	2.36
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	16	44	66	72	58	110	2.47	2.53
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	20	31	46	31	22	206	2.98	2.82
Associate Deans
Q11	The performance of the Associate Dean, Biological and Health Sciences, Peter Hitchcock is fully satisfactory.	31	42	23	4	4	258	4.00	3.93
Q12	The performance of the Associate Dean, Humanities and the Arts, Deborah Keller-Cohen is fully satisfactory.	30	37	20	2	8	261	4.00	3.88
Q13	The performance of the Associate Dean, Physical Science and Engineering, Michael Solomon is fully satisfactory.	29	39	21	4	5	264	3.99	3.88
Q14	The performance of the Associate Dean, Social Sciences, Robin Means Coleman is fully satisfactory.	26	30	24	5	3	271	3.90	3.88

Response rate: 8% Responded 374 Eligible 4841 (3628 Senate, 1213 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	38	90	44	38	33	73	3.57	3.57
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	51	99	46	25	28	65	3.76	3.73
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	48	81	43	56	23	64	3.54	3.38
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	34	77	47	69	27	61	3.16	3.04
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	40	91	51	46	28	58	3.53	3.48
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	43	92	52	41	28	59	3.58	3.53
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	15	20	36	31	34	178	2.58	2.30
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	13	15	33	35	30	185	2.44	2.35
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	15	42	62	67	55	75	2.48	2.57
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	19	30	45	31	22	161	2.96	2.81
Associate Deans
Q11	The performance of the Associate Dean, Biological and Health Sciences, Peter Hitchcock is fully satisfactory.	30	39	22	4	4	213	4.00	3.91
Q12	The performance of the Associate Dean, Humanities and the Arts, Deborah Keller-Cohen is fully satisfactory.	28	34	19	2	6	220	4.01	3.91
Q13	The performance of the Associate Dean, Physical Science and Engineering, Michael Solomon is fully satisfactory.	27	37	20	4	5	219	3.97	3.96
Q14	The performance of the Associate Dean, Social Sciences, Robin Means Coleman is fully satisfactory.	24	28	22	5	3	229	3.89	3.90

Response rate: 9% Responded 320 Eligible 3628

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Q1	Rackham distributes funding in an equitable and transparent manner.	1	5	3	4	1	35	3.17	2.75
Q2	Rackham makes student awards in an equitable and transparent manner.	1	7	4	2	1	35	3.57	3.50
Q3	Rackham adequately publicizes its funding allocations to the various graduate programs.	2	4	3	4	0	37	3.33	3.33
Q4	Rackham makes known its policies for allocating funding to the various graduate programs.	1	2	3	6	0	38	2.50	2.50
Q5	Rackham adequately publicizes its distribution of awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	2	5	3	6	0	34	3.17	3.00
Q6	Rackham makes known its policies for making awards to the students of the various graduate programs.	2	4	2	6	0	36	3.00	3.17
Q7	All programs receive roughly the same funding from Rackham per student.	1	1	1	1	0	46	3.50	2.33
Q8	All units receive roughly the same number of awards per student.	1	1	0	0	0	47	4.50	2.50
Q9	Rackham decision-making is transparent.	1	2	4	5	3	35	2.40	2.00
Q10	Rackham allows graduate programs to have influence on policy in proportion to their size.	1	1	1	0	0	45	4.00	3.17
Associate Deans
Q11	The performance of the Associate Dean, Biological and Health Sciences, Peter Hitchcock is fully satisfactory.	1	3	1	0	0	45	4.00	2.75
Q12	The performance of the Associate Dean, Humanities and the Arts, Deborah Keller-Cohen is fully satisfactory.	2	3	1	0	2	41	3.83	2.75
Q13	The performance of the Associate Dean, Physical Science and Engineering, Michael Solomon is fully satisfactory.	2	2	1	0	0	45	4.25	3.00
Q14	The performance of the Associate Dean, Social Sciences, Robin Means Coleman is fully satisfactory.	2	2	2	0	0	42	4.00	3.00

Response rate: 4% Responded 54 Eligible 1213

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2016/2017 results

Back to AEC home