Administration Evaluation

Dean, Medical School, Marschall Runge

combined report for all faculty

Senate faculty only

non-senate faculty only

separate reports by unit

combined report for all faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	29	74	37	40	16	14	21	3.57	3.89	3.86	3.92	3.94	3.76
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	13	34	29	32	9	21	92	3.10	3.52	3.12	3.30	3.00	2.78
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	22	58	30	26	9	17	68	3.63	3.62	3.52	3.60	3.70	3.69
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	23	43	58	40	29	19	18	2.97	3.14	2.94	3.19	3.29	3.38
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	32	73	46	41	27	7	3	3.40	3.66	3.71	3.81	3.73	3.72
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	27	64	55	45	18	14	7	3.25	3.39	3.04	3.53	3.60	3.55
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	15	48	36	54	41	27	7	2.56	2.61	2.45	3.02	2.53	2.39
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	43	82	45	27	17	11	5	3.72	3.88	3.76	3.92	3.80
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	31	59	55	36	33	12	3	3.19	3.48	3.41	3.72	3.66	3.64
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	9	24	45	52	84	16	1	1.94	1.96	1.86	2.35	2.38	2.71
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	29	63	49	42	40	8	0	3.10	3.29	3.15	3.59	3.40	3.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	24	22	40	20	23	92	9	3.04	3.08	3.00	3.32	3.34	3.38
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	18	34	47	56	72	4	1	2.24	2.31	2.32	2.80	2.71	2.61
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	17	45	54	52	54	5	2	2.59	2.77	2.64	3.02	3.10	2.99
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	23	17	46	55	50	37	1	2.33	2.11	2.10	2.17	2.16	2.47
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	12	9	43	60	66	33	1	1.98	1.79	1.76	1.85	1.77	1.95
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	17	49	49	21	18	64	5	3.28	3.32	3.44	3.47	3.35	3.39
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	63	81	41	24	15	6	1	3.90	3.93	3.65
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	24	49	58	44	54	1	0	2.78	2.89	2.95	3.41	3.25	3.51
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	27	39	35	53	49	25	1	2.49	2.55
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	19	15	32	47	88	27	1	1.77	1.69
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	41	70	45	31	40	1	0	3.44
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	28	56	55	37	49	2	0	2.98
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	63	68	38	22	11	16	2	3.94	3.92	3.74	3.90	3.76	3.74	3.68
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	33	42	43	10	10	72	11	3.64
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	41	82	42	10	6	41	1	3.90	3.76
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	39	54	33	19	5	61	6	3.83	3.50	3.67	3.87	3.74	3.60	3.74
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	21	29	19	26	51	65	9	2.35	3.37
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	15	31	30	4	13	111	12	3.48	3.42	3.48	3.50	3.65	3.32	3.61
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	22	31	35	9	10	100	10	3.49
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	44	78	29	8	6	48	6	4.01	3.87	3.83	4.03	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	36	43	23	3	6	92	13	4.05
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	50	44	39	10	15	50	6	3.84
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	26	30	32	4	6	109	8	3.73
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	24	42	27	18	13	85	7	3.60	3.56	3.59	3.81
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	33	47	28	11	7	84	6	3.86
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	50	51	28	9	4	66	8	4.09	3.92	3.90	4.14	3.94	3.83	3.82
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	40	56	33	7	8	66	7	3.93	3.81	3.75	3.88	3.86	3.96

Response rate: 16% Responded 235 Eligible 1504 (1307 Senate, 197 non-Senate)

University Senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	28	68	36	37	16	12	20	3.55	3.90
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	13	32	27	31	9	18	86	3.09	3.52
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	20	54	29	26	9	14	64	3.59	3.62
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	22	39	54	38	29	17	17	2.94	3.13
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	31	70	43	40	27	3	1	3.40	3.63
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	27	61	54	43	18	9	4	3.25	3.35
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	15	46	36	52	40	21	4	2.57	2.60
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	43	80	44	26	15	5	3	3.74	3.86
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	30	56	55	34	31	8	1	3.19	3.45
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	8	22	42	50	81	13	1	1.91	1.94
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	28	57	47	40	39	6	0	3.06	3.28
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	23	20	37	20	23	84	9	3.00	3.08
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	17	31	45	52	69	3	1	2.23	2.29
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	16	42	51	49	51	4	2	2.59	2.76
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	21	16	44	53	50	30	1	2.29	2.07
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	10	8	42	57	66	26	1	1.95	1.77
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	16	45	47	21	18	57	5	3.23	3.29
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	60	73	39	24	15	5	1	3.88	3.93
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	23	44	56	41	52	0	0	2.77	2.88
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	25	37	34	48	49	21	1	2.49	2.59
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	18	14	30	41	87	24	1	1.70	1.68
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	38	64	43	29	40	0	0	3.38
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	27	49	53	36	47	1	0	2.93
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	62	67	37	20	10	9	1	3.96	3.90
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	31	40	42	10	9	66	10	3.62
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	39	78	41	10	6	34	1	3.88	3.75
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	37	52	33	19	5	53	5	3.81	3.49
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	20	28	18	24	48	61	8	2.38	3.29
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	15	28	30	4	13	102	11	3.43	3.42
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	22	29	32	9	10	92	10	3.50
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	42	72	28	8	6	43	6	4.00	3.86
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	36	40	23	3	6	83	12	4.05
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	50	42	38	9	14	43	5	3.87
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	26	29	31	4	6	99	7	3.74
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	23	40	27	18	12	77	6	3.58	3.54
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	33	46	27	11	7	74	5	3.87
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	46	49	28	8	4	60	8	4.06	3.91
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	38	54	32	7	8	58	6	3.92	3.80

Response rate: 17% Responded 220 Eligible 1307

non-senate faculty

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	1	6	1	3	0	2	1	3.75	3.75
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	0	2	2	1	0	3	6	3.25	3.50
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	2	4	1	0	0	3	4	4.12	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	1	4	4	2	0	2	1	3.38	3.25
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	1	3	3	1	0	4	2	3.50	4.20
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	0	3	1	2	0	5	3	3.50	4.00
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	0	2	0	2	1	6	3	2.25	3.75
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	0	2	1	1	2	6	2	2.50	4.17
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	1	3	0	2	2	4	2	3.00	3.90
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1	2	3	2	3	3	0	2.67	2.33
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	1	6	2	2	1	2	0	3.67	3.62
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	1	2	3	0	0	8	0	3.50	2.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	1	3	2	4	3	1	0	2.38	3.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	1	3	3	3	3	1	0	2.67	3.17
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2	1	2	2	0	7	0	3.25	3.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2	1	1	3	0	7	0	3.00	2.17
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	1	4	2	0	0	7	0	3.88	3.90
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3	8	2	0	0	1	0	4.06	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	1	5	2	3	2	1	0	3.25	3.25
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2	2	1	5	0	4	0	2.50	2.17
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1	1	2	6	1	3	0	2.25	2.00
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3	6	2	2	0	1	0	3.92
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1	7	2	1	2	1	0	3.71
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	1	1	1	2	1	7	1	2.50	4.20
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	2	2	1	0	1	6	1	4.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	2	4	1	0	0	7	0	4.12	4.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	2	2	0	0	0	8	1	4.50	4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1	1	1	2	3	4	1	2.00	3.92
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	0	3	0	0	0	9	1	4.00	3.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	0	2	3	0	0	8	0	3.33
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	2	6	1	0	0	5	0	4.08	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	0	3	0	0	0	9	1	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	0	2	1	1	1	7	1	3.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	0	1	1	0	0	10	1	3.50
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	1	2	0	0	1	8	1	4.00	4.25
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	0	1	1	0	0	10	1	3.50
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4	2	0	1	0	6	0	4.62	4.17
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	2	2	1	0	0	8	1	4.25	4.50

Response rate: 8% Responded 15 Eligible 197

Separate reports by unit

Anesthesiology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	4.00	4.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	5.00	4.50
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	3.50	4.75
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.00	2.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	4.00	4.50
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	5.00	3.00
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	5.00	2.50
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3.00	3.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.50	2.50
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	3.00	1.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.00	1.25
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	3.00	2.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	1.25
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	1.25
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.00	1.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.50	1.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	5.00	2.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.00	2.50
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.00	2.50
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.00	2.00
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.00	1.00
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	4.50
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	3.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	3.00	3.50	2.00	5.00	5.00	4.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	3.00	1.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	2.00	1.50	2.00	4.00	5.00	4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1.00	1.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.		1.00			4.00	3.75
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	1.00	3.00	4.00	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	1.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	4.00	2.75
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	3.00	2.00		4.00	3.00	4.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.		3.00			3.00

Response rate: 5% Responded 2 Eligible 40
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Biological Chemistry

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	0	3	3	3	2	0	1	2.67	3.00	3.70	2.50	3.17	1.40
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	0	3	4	4	0	0	1	2.88	3.60	2.50	2.20	1.80	1.17
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	0	4	3	3	1	0	1	3.00	2.12	2.50	3.17	3.67	2.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	1	3	5	1	1	0	1	3.20	3.60	2.50	2.25	3.60	2.50
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	0	4	1	4	2	1	0	2.38	2.31	3.17	2.75	2.38	1.14
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	0	2	4	5	0	1	0	2.62	2.08	1.75	2.25	3.17	3.75
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	0	3	2	2	3	2	0	2.50	2.50	2.25	3.67	1.40	1.38
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	0	3	0	5	2	2	0	2.10	3.25	2.83	3.83	3.25
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	2	4	3	3	0	0	0	3.50	3.75	3.70	3.62	3.83	3.83
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	0	1	3	2	5	1	0	1.75	2.06	2.30	2.67	2.25	2.62
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	1	4	5	1	1	0	0	3.30	3.58	3.25	3.33	3.71	3.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	1	2	0	1	1	6	1	3.75	3.20	3.17	3.00		3.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	2	4	3	2	0	1	2.62	2.42	3.00	3.00	2.67	2.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	3	3	3	2	0	1	2.67	2.58	3.10	3.17	2.75	2.67
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1	0	3	2	4	1	1	2.00	1.50	1.38	1.50	1.30	2.67
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	0	0	2	2	6	1	1	1.33	1.42	1.08	1.10	1.30	1.75
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	0	4	3	2	0	2	1	3.33	3.62	3.90	3.50	3.33	3.50
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3	4	1	2	1	1	0	3.88	4.17	2.50
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	0	5	4	3	0	0	0	3.25	3.00	3.50	3.60	3.29	3.70
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1	3	1	2	3	2	0	2.50	2.25
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	0	0	1	1	7	3	0	1.14	1.42
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	1	3	3	3	2	0	0	2.83
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	0	4	4	2	2	0	0	3.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	2	3	2	3	1	1	0	3.25	3.80	3.67	3.00	3.33	2.50	2.50
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	0	1	3	0	1	7	0	3.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	0	5	2	1	1	3	0	3.60	3.25
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	0	3	1	1	1	6	0	3.50	2.75	2.83	2.50	3.00	3.50	3.50
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	0	1	1	0	1	9	0	3.00	3.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	0	1	1	0	1	9	0	3.00	3.50	3.00	3.00	3.00	2.00	3.50
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	0	1	1	0	1	9	0	3.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	0	6	2	0	1	3	0	3.75	3.75	3.25	4.00	3.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	1	3	2	0	1	5	0	3.67
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	1	4	2	1	1	3	0	3.62
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	1	1	1	2	1	6	0	2.50
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	0	2	2	2	1	5	0	2.75	3.00	3.00	3.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	0	3	2	1	1	5	0	3.25
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	1	3	1	0	1	6	0	3.83	3.75	3.50	4.00	3.50	4.00	2.75
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	2	6	2	1	1	0	0	3.83	3.33	3.00	3.50	2.67	2.50

Response rate: 30% Responded 12 Eligible 40

Biomedical Engineering

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.75	2.50	2.25
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2.00	3.00	3.00	3.25	3.00	2.25
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.		4.50	3.25	4.00	2.50	2.25
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2.00	2.00	3.00	2.50	3.00	2.75
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	2.00	3.00	3.75	3.50	3.50	2.25
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	2.00	3.00	3.25	3.00	4.00	2.25
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	2.00	1.50	3.75	2.00	3.00	2.75
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3.00	3.50	3.75	4.00	3.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.00	3.00	3.75	3.50	3.50	3.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2.00	3.00	2.00	2.75	4.00	3.50
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	2.00	3.00	2.50	3.50	4.00	3.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.				3.50		3.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.00	2.50	1.50	3.00	4.00	3.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.00	2.50	2.00	3.17	4.00	3.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	3.00	3.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.50
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	3.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	3.50
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.00	3.00	3.00	4.00	4.00	3.50
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4.00	3.00	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	2.00	3.00	2.75	3.17	5.00	3.00
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.00	1.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.00	1.50
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	2.00
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	2.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.00	3.00	4.17	3.50	4.00	3.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.		4.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.			4.00	4.00	4.00	3.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.				3.00		3.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.		1.00	4.50	4.75
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.				4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.				3.00	4.00	3.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.00	5.00	3.50	4.00	4.00	4.00

Response rate: 4% Responded 2 Eligible 52
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Cell and Developmental Biology

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	0	4	2	4	0	0	0	3.00	3.79	3.83	4.00	4.00	2.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	0	3	5	1	0	0	1	3.20	3.67	3.17	2.20	1.25	2.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	0	2	4	3	1	0	0	2.75	3.75	3.75	3.33	2.50	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	0	1	4	2	1	2	0	2.75	3.38	3.50	3.00	2.83	2.80
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	1	1	2	3	3	0	0	2.17	2.75	3.72	3.00	3.00	2.10
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	0	4	1	1	4	0	0	2.50	2.75	1.50	1.30	2.00	1.75
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	0	0	3	4	1	1	1	2.25	2.40	2.50	2.00	2.00	1.25
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	1	4	4	0	0	0	1	3.62	4.00	4.38	4.33	3.75
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	1	2	5	0	2	0	0	3.10	3.00	3.50	3.38	3.25	3.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	0	0	3	5	1	1	0	2.20	1.67	2.20	1.88	2.33	2.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	0	4	1	2	1	2	0	3.50	3.62	3.25	3.75	3.50	3.20
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	0	1	1	3	0	4	1	2.33	3.00	4.00	3.00	3.50	3.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	0	5	3	2	0	0	2.50	2.12	2.75	2.75	2.38	2.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	1	5	1	2	0	1	2.80	2.60	3.00	3.00	3.00	2.50
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	0	0	3	3	4	0	0	1.83	2.00	2.38	1.83	1.25	1.50
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	0	0	3	3	4	0	0	1.83	1.42	2.00	1.50	1.10	1.20
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	0	1	2	0	1	5	0	3.00	3.17	4.10	4.00	3.17	3.67
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3	3	1	1	1	1	0	4.00	3.80	3.90
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	0	2	4	2	2	0	0	2.75	3.00	3.50	3.33	3.62	2.70
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2	0	2	4	1	1	0	2.38	1.42
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2	0	2	3	3	0	0	2.17	1.10
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	2	3	1	2	2	0	0	3.50
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	3.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	1	6	0	2	1	0	0	3.83	3.83	3.86	3.62	1.25	3.25	3.83
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	0	3	0	0	0	5	2	4.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	0	5	2	0	1	2	0	3.70	3.33
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	2	1	0	2	1	3	0	3.00	3.00	2.25	3.25	3.00	3.25	3.25
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	0	2	0	0	0	5	2	4.00	3.50
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	0	1	0	0	0	6	2	4.00	3.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	0	1	0	0	0	6	2	4.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	1	2	0	0	0	4	2	4.25	3.38	4.10	4.00	4.25
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	1	2	0	0	0	5	1	4.25
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	0	4	2	1	0	1	1	3.62
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	0	1	0	1	1	5	1	2.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	0	2	1	2	1	2	1	2.50	3.12	3.62	3.50
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	0	2	2	1	0	3	1	3.25
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	1	2	2	1	0	3	0	3.50	3.00	3.92	4.50	3.00	3.75	4.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	2	4	2	1	0	0	0	3.88	3.38	3.50	3.83	3.80	4.12

Response rate: 26% Responded 10 Eligible 39

Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2	1	3	3	2	0	0	2.67	3.83	4.33	4.00	3.00	3.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	3	4	2	0	0	0	2	4.12	3.83	2.50	4.50	4.00	4.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	4	5	1	1	0	0	0	4.20	3.75	2.25	4.00	4.75	4.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3	4	2	2	0	0	0	3.88	3.83	3.00	4.50	3.00	4.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	2	2	1	3	3	0	0	2.33	3.50	4.00	2.25	4.00	4.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3	2	2	1	3	0	0	3.25	3.00	2.75	2.00	2.25	2.00
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	2	2	2	5	0	0	0	2.75	3.50	2.25	2.50	3.50	2.50
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3	6	1	1	0	0	0	4.08	4.00	3.75	3.75	4.75
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3	3	5	0	0	0	0	3.67	4.00	2.50	3.75	4.50	3.50
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2	0	3	3	3	0	0	2.33	2.75	1.17	2.50	2.00	3.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	2	3	3	2	1	0	0	3.33	3.50	3.00	3.50	4.00	4.00
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	3	2	3	1	1	1	0	3.50	3.25	3.00	4.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2	0	5	2	2	0	0	2.80	2.25	2.00	3.00	2.75	3.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	2	2	3	2	1	0	0	3.17	2.25	2.67	3.00	3.00	3.50
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	3	1	1	1	4	1	0	2.50	3.50	2.25	3.50	2.00	2.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	3	0	1	2	4	0	0	2.00	3.00	1.88	2.00	1.50	1.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3	2	2	1	1	2	0	3.75	3.33	3.17	3.00	4.25	4.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	1	4	1	2	3	0	0	3.00	3.00	3.50
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	2	2	4	2	1	0	0	3.12	4.00	2.12	3.00	3.75	3.50
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3	1	2	2	3	0	0	2.75	3.25
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1	0	2	4	3	1	0	2.00	2.67
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3	2	3	1	2	0	0	3.33
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	2	3	2	2	2	0	0	3.25
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	3	4	1	1	1	0	0	4.00	3.25	2.33	3.25	4.25	5.00	4.50
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	1	2	2	0	0	3	1	3.75
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	1	6	2	0	0	1	0	3.92	3.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	1	2	3	0	0	2	1	3.50	3.00	2.25	4.00	3.75		4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1	0	2	0	0	5	1	3.25	3.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	0	0	2	0	0	6	1	3.00	3.00	3.00	4.00	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	0	2	1	0	0	6	0	3.75
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	1	3	2	0	0	4	0	3.83	3.00	3.00	3.00	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4	1	1	0	0	3	0	4.75
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	1	1	4	1	0	2	0	3.12
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	1	0	2	0	0	6	0	3.25
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	1	2	2	1	2	2	0	3.00	3.25	2.25	2.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	1	1	2	0	0	5	0	3.50
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	2	2	1	0	0	4	1	4.25	3.25	4.00	5.00	4.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	1	3	2	2	2	1	0	3.00	3.00	3.50	4.50	4.25

Response rate: 28% Responded 11 Eligible 39

Dermatology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	2.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.50
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	2.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.50
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	4.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	3.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	4.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	5.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	4.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	4.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	3.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	3.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	4.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	4.00
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	4.50
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	4.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.00				3.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	3.00			5.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	5.00

Response rate: 15% Responded 2 Eligible 13
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Family Medicine

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	3.00	4.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2.00	3.50
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	3.75	3.00
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.75	3.50
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	4.62	3.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.25	2.50
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	3.00	2.50
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3.75	4.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	4.00	4.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2.50	2.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.75	2.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	4.00	3.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	3.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.25	3.50
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.12	1.50
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2.00	1.50
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.00	4.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4.92	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.75	3.00
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.83	2.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.83	2.50
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	4.25
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	3.25
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.50	5.00	4.00		4.00	3.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	4.25
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.75	5.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.90	5.00	5.00	5.00	4.00	5.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.50
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.00	2.00		1.00	1.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	4.25
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.75	5.00	4.75
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	4.83
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	4.00	2.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.17	4.50	4.00	3.00	2.00	3.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.75	5.00			1.00

Response rate: 29% Responded 7 Eligible 24
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Human Genetics

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2.25	2.40	3.00	4.00	4.00	3.83
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2.00	3.80	3.00	3.75	2.50	1.83
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	3.25	3.80	3.25	4.00	3.00	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2.33	3.62	2.67	3.00	2.38	3.75
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	2.25	2.40	2.33	3.00	3.75	3.50
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	2.83	2.20	2.12	3.25	3.50	3.50
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	2.33	2.25	2.12	2.00	1.83	2.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3.50	4.33	4.00	3.00	3.75
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.00	3.62	3.67	3.00	2.67	3.50
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2.75	1.83	2.12	2.00	1.67	2.75
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.75	3.00	3.25	3.00	2.33	3.90
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	3.00	3.25	4.00	3.50	3.50	4.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	1.92	2.12	2.00	1.38	3.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.50	2.75	2.20	2.25	2.17	2.17
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.25	1.20	1.50	2.00	1.75	1.17
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.67	1.25	1.62	1.50	1.25	1.17
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition		3.75	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.50
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4.25	4.08	3.92
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.83	3.25	2.62	3.00	1.75	3.83
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.25	2.25
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.00	1.67
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3.83
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	3.50
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	3.17	3.50	3.00	3.25	2.67	3.50	2.25
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.75	3.50	4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	3.50	4.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.					4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	3.50
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.75	3.25	4.00	3.75
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.50
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	3.50	2.25	3.00	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	3.50
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.50	3.50	4.00	4.00	3.75	4.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	4.50	4.00	3.00	4.00

Response rate: 22% Responded 6 Eligible 27
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Internal Medicine

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	0	19	4	4	3	0	14	3.71	3.97	3.67	4.18	4.00	3.67
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	0	4	5	2	1	4	27	3.10	3.15	3.20	4.25	3.72	3.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	0	10	5	3	0	3	22	3.60	3.57	3.65	3.93	3.79	3.60
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	1	7	10	5	8	1	12	2.75	3.08	2.86	3.30	3.55	3.58
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	4	20	8	7	2	1	1	3.67	3.66	3.76	4.00	3.73	2.50
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	5	16	13	5	1	1	2	3.56	3.62	3.14	3.60	3.38	3.50
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	1	14	6	8	8	3	2	2.92	2.91	2.67	2.86	2.64	2.10
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3	21	10	3	4	1	1	3.67	4.00	3.65	3.62	3.65
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3	12	13	6	7	1	1	3.08	3.18	3.31	3.71	3.77	3.58
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1	7	4	9	21	1	0	1.50	1.81	1.50	2.57	2.08	2.70
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	5	10	10	7	11	0	0	2.85	3.19	3.06	3.78	3.00	3.60
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	4	3	8	5	6	16	2	2.75	3.42	2.40	3.14	2.75	3.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	3	6	2	15	18	0	0	1.77	2.35	2.17	2.43	2.70	2.17
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3	7	4	16	14	0	0	2.00	3.00	2.38	2.91	3.12	2.38
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	3	4	9	11	10	6	0	2.27	2.25	2.31	2.67	2.62	2.40
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	2	8	12	11	8	0	2.00	1.84	1.91	2.21	2.06	2.30
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	0	10	12	4	4	12	1	3.08	3.00	3.15	3.62	3.25	2.17
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	11	15	12	4	2	0	0	3.77	3.98	3.46
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	4	5	10	9	15	0	0	2.22	2.61	2.58	3.32	3.25	3.30
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	4	5	9	11	13	2	0	2.23	3.61
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3	3	4	8	24	2	0	1.38	1.95
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	8	11	8	7	9	0	0	3.19
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	5	6	13	8	12	0	0	2.65
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	10	15	9	3	2	2	0	3.87	3.75	3.44	4.04	3.78	3.00	3.43
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	2	10	11	2	3	12	2	3.32
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	6	16	13	1	0	5	0	3.75	3.87
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	5	11	10	1	1	12	1	3.68	3.59	3.17	3.50	3.75	3.70	3.25
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1	7	1	7	12	10	3	1.79	3.36
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	2	6	6	1	1	20	4	3.50	3.62	3.67	3.86	3.85	3.00	3.50
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	0	5	9	1	1	21	5	3.17
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4	16	6	4	2	8	1	3.75	3.91	3.67	3.86	3.92
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	8	9	6	2	0	10	5	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	9	6	11	2	5	6	1	3.36
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	4	5	8	0	2	20	1	3.44
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	2	8	7	4	4	14	1	3.14	3.78	3.67	3.75
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	2	16	4	3	2	11	1	3.78
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	2	13	6	1	2	12	5	3.73	3.96	3.91	4.00	4.06	3.62	3.80
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	6	8	7	2	3	12	2	3.62	3.93	3.69	4.17	4.17	4.30

Response rate: 13% Responded 44 Eligible 332

Learning Health Sciences

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	3.00	3.00	2.33	3.50	4.00	3.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2.50	3.00	3.00	2.75	3.00	2.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	2.50	2.00	3.00	4.00	3.50	3.00
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	1.50	2.75	1.75	3.50	3.50	4.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.50	3.75	3.67	3.83	4.00	4.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	2.75	2.00	2.33	4.00	2.50	3.25
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	1.50	1.00	2.25	2.50	3.00	3.50
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3.50	3.00	3.75	4.17	3.50
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	2.00	3.00	2.00	3.50	3.50	4.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1.10	2.00	1.12	1.25	2.50
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	1.50	2.25	1.33	2.50	3.00	3.00
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2.00	3.00	3.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	1.50	2.00	2.67	2.25	2.50	3.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	2.50	2.75	3.00	3.00	3.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.75	2.75	2.75	3.00	3.00	2.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2.25	2.25	2.50	2.00	3.00	2.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	2.00	2.75	1.50	2.00	3.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4.50	4.00	3.75
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	1.50	2.25	1.17	2.83	3.00	3.50
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.00	3.00
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.50	1.50
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	1.50
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1.50
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.75	4.00	3.50		4.75	4.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3.50
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.50	3.50
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.67	2.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.75	4.50
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	3.00	4.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	2.00	3.25	3.00	4.00	4.00		4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	3.75	3.25	3.67	4.00	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	2.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	2.50	2.25	3.25	5.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	3.67
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.83	3.50	4.00	4.50	4.50	4.75	4.50
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.17	4.00	3.25	4.00

Response rate: 21% Responded 6 Eligible 29
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Microbiology and Immunology

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	1	8	4	1	1	0	0	3.69	4.00	4.17	4.30	4.40	3.83
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	0	4	1	5	2	0	3	2.30	3.50	3.00	4.00	3.33	3.50
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	0	6	1	5	3	0	0	2.40	2.20	2.83	3.50	2.25	3.00
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	0	3	4	5	1	2	0	2.62	2.10	2.83	2.88	3.12	3.17
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3	5	3	3	1	0	0	3.60	4.30	4.00	4.30	4.10	4.14
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	2	3	4	5	1	0	0	2.88	2.50	3.00	3.75	4.00	4.00
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	0	2	3	8	1	1	0	2.25	1.50	1.83	3.50	2.17	2.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	2	7	3	2	1	0	0	3.71	3.75	2.50	3.75	3.50
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	1	5	3	5	1	0	0	3.00	3.00	2.50	3.75	3.50	2.33
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	0	1	3	5	5	1	0	1.90	1.60	1.88	1.83	2.62	2.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	0	4	5	4	2	0	0	2.80	2.25	2.50	3.50	3.25	2.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	1	2	2	1	0	9	0	3.50	1.17	1.50	3.00	3.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	3	4	2	5	1	0	2.50	1.50	2.00	3.25	2.50	1.75
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	4	4	4	3	0	0	2.62	2.33	2.67	3.33	2.75	2.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2	2	3	5	3	0	0	2.40	2.50	1.25	1.33	2.00	3.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	1	3	5	5	0	0	2.00	1.50	1.20	1.12	1.83	1.67
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	0	3	4	1	1	6	0	3.12	3.50	3.00	3.50	3.33	1.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4	7	1	2	0	1	0	4.07	4.00	3.88
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	0	5	5	3	2	0	0	3.00	2.75	2.83	3.70	3.17	3.17
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	0	2	2	3	4	4	0	2.00	1.20
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	0	0	3	4	4	4	0	1.88	1.38
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	0	4	2	5	4	0	0	2.20
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1	4	2	5	2	0	0	2.50
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	7	2	2	3	1	0	0	4.25	4.25	3.50	4.25	4.12	4.00	3.83
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	1	1	2	0	0	10	1	3.50
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	2	5	1	2	0	5	0	3.90	3.17
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3	8	0	1	0	3	0	4.12	4.00	3.67	4.33	3.38	4.00	4.50
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1	2	1	0	2	9	0	3.50	3.50
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	0	1	1	0	0	13	0	3.50	5.00	4.00		3.00		4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	3	0	1	0	0	11	0	4.83
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	3	4	1	0	0	7	0	4.25	3.83	3.75	3.83	3.67
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4	3	2	0	2	4	0	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	5	6	2	1	1	0	0	4.08
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	3	3	2	0	0	7	0	4.17
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	1	1	4	2	0	7	0	3.00	3.75	3.00	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	2	2	2	1	0	8	0	3.75
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4	1	2	0	0	6	1	4.62	4.00	4.00	4.10	3.25	4.50	3.17
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	6	7	1	0	1	0	0	4.29	4.75	4.25	4.50	4.88	4.75

Response rate: 35% Responded 15 Eligible 43

Molecular and Integrative Physiology

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2	2	1	3	1	1	1	3.00	4.50	4.60	4.83	4.67	4.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	1	2	0	3	0	1	4	3.00	4.17	4.17	3.00	4.00	3.75
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	1	4	0	2	0	1	3	3.88	4.00	4.00	3.50	3.88	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2	2	4	1	1	0	0	3.25	3.50	3.00	3.00	3.20	3.50
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	1	4	2	1	3	0	0	3.25	4.25	3.92	4.50	4.79	4.17
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	1	4	3	2	1	0	0	3.33	3.90	3.50	3.50	4.25	4.17
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	1	2	0	2	5	1	0	1.50	3.50	2.62	3.83	3.00	4.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	2	5	3	0	1	0	0	3.80	4.75	4.07	4.17	4.10
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	2	1	5	0	2	1	0	3.10	3.67	3.88	4.50	3.33	3.50
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1	1	0	7	2	1	0	2.00	2.70	2.17	2.75	3.00	3.50
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	2	4	2	1	2	1	0	3.62	3.88	3.20	4.50	3.75	3.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2	0	2	0	1	5	0	3.25	3.25	3.00	4.50	3.50	5.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2	0	2	5	3	0	0	2.10	2.12	2.62	3.00	3.17	3.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	2	1	3	4	1	0	0	2.67	3.33	2.75	3.00	3.17	2.50
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1	1	2	4	2	2	0	2.25	1.14	1.80	1.50	2.75	2.50
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	0	2	3	2	2	0	2.17	1.06	1.50	1.50	2.25	1.25
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	2	1	4	0	0	3	0	3.38	3.83	4.00	3.25	3.33	4.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4	4	2	1	0	0	0	4.12	3.93	4.12
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	2	0	5	2	2	0	0	2.80	3.17	3.62	3.50	3.25	3.50
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3	3	3	2	1	0	0	3.50	2.25
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3	1	2	3	2	1	0	2.75	1.62
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3	3	3	0	2	0	0	3.67
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	2	2	6	0	1	0	0	3.25
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	6	2	1	2	0	0	0	4.58	4.90	3.38	4.00	3.83	4.50	4.75
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	2	1	2	0	0	5	1	4.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	3	3	1	1	0	3	0	4.17	3.33
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	1	1	2	3	0	3	1	2.75	3.12	3.75	3.00	3.75	3.50	3.50
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1	1	0	2	3	4	1	1.75	3.33
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	1	2	1	0	1	5	1	3.75	3.33	1.00		4.00	5.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	2	1	0	1	0	4	1	4.50
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	3	3	2	0	0	2	1	4.17	3.62	3.00	4.00	4.67
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	1	1	1	0	0	6	1	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	5	1	2	0	0	1	1	4.70
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	1	0	1	0	0	7	1	4.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	2	1	0	2	0	5	1	4.00	3.00	2.50	3.50
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	3	1	1	0	0	5	0	4.67
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	2	1	0	0	0	6	1	4.75	3.67	3.33	3.75	3.00	3.00	2.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	3	5	0	0	0	2	0	4.30	4.00	4.33	4.00	3.83	4.50

Response rate: 30% Responded 13 Eligible 44

Neurology

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	4	9	0	1	0	3	1	4.17	3.83	3.88	4.17	3.93	4.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	0	1	1	1	0	4	11	3.00	3.75	2.50	2.00	1.00	2.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	0	1	2	0	0	4	11	3.25	4.00	2.00	3.25	4.00	3.00
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	0	2	6	5	0	3	1	2.75	2.75	3.25	3.00	3.75	2.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	1	5	7	3	1	1	0	3.14	3.67	2.83	3.25	3.62	3.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	1	3	5	6	0	3	0	2.80	3.70	1.33	2.25	3.75	3.50
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	0	3	1	8	1	5	0	2.19	2.80	3.00	2.50	3.00	2.50
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	2	3	5	3	2	3	0	3.00	4.00	3.88	4.10	4.40
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	0	4	2	5	5	2	0	2.10	2.50	4.00	3.00	3.83	4.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	0	1	5	4	7	1	0	1.88	1.80	2.83	1.50	2.67	1.25
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	0	7	3	6	2	0	0	2.83	3.30	3.25	2.75	3.25	2.00
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	0	1	6	0	0	10	1	3.08	3.50	3.50	1.25	3.50	2.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	1	4	7	6	0	0	1.93	1.67	2.33	2.00	2.67	2.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	1	4	6	6	1	0	1.92	2.25	3.00	2.50	3.38	3.50
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1	0	4	2	1	10	0	2.75	2.17	1.50	1.75	1.83	1.50
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	0	0	6	1	2	9	0	2.75	2.00	1.50	1.75	1.75	1.50
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	0	3	3	1	0	10	0	3.33	3.17	3.50	3.00	3.83	3.75
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4	9	3	1	1	0	0	3.94	3.93	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	0	5	3	6	4	0	0	2.33	2.17	3.50	3.00	3.50	3.00
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1	4	2	6	2	3	0	2.42	3.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	0	2	2	7	5	1	0	1.93	2.12
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	2	9	6	1	0	0	0	3.72
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1	7	5	2	3	0	0	3.30
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	2	5	3	2	1	3	0	3.60	4.00	4.17	3.33	3.50	4.50	4.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	2	3	6	2	1	3	0	3.17
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	1	8	3	1	0	4	0	3.81	3.75
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	2	5	4	1	0	5	0	3.70	3.75	3.50	4.25	4.00	1.00	4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	0	1	3	4	7	2	0	1.62	2.33
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	1	2	5	0	0	9	0	3.30	3.00	3.00	3.50	3.00	2.00	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	1	3	5	0	0	8	0	3.40
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	1	6	5	0	0	5	0	3.67	3.75	3.75	3.00	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	0	7	0	0	0	10	0	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	1	3	4	1	1	7	0	3.25
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	0	1	5	0	0	11	0	3.10
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	0	7	2	0	0	8	0	3.86	3.88	2.00	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	1	4	4	0	0	8	0	3.62
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	3	3	5	1	0	5	0	3.50	3.17	4.50	3.25	4.00	3.00	3.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	0	2	4	0	0	11	0	3.25	4.00	3.50	4.00		4.00

Response rate: 19% Responded 19 Eligible 98

Neurosurgery

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2.75	3.83	4.00	3.75	3.00	3.75
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2.50	4.00	2.00	3.75	4.00	3.50
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.		4.00	4.00	4.00	3.00	3.83
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2.00	3.00	2.00	3.50	2.50	4.25
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.00	4.00	4.00	4.17	3.50	3.88
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.00	4.00	3.00	4.50	3.50	3.25
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	3.00	3.00	2.00	3.83	1.00	3.25
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3.00	3.50	1.50	4.75	3.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	2.50	3.50	1.50	4.75	3.00	4.25
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1.17	1.17	1.25	3.00	1.00	3.50
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	1.50	2.00	1.25	4.50	3.00	3.75
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	1.17	2.50	2.00	4.00	3.00	4.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	1.17	1.17	1.50	3.00	1.00	4.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	1.50	1.17	2.00	4.00	2.00	4.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.00	1.17	1.25	2.00	1.00	4.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.25	1.17	1.25	3.00	1.00	2.25
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.75	3.00	3.00	4.00	2.00	4.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.50	2.50	2.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	1.50	1.50	1.25	4.00	1.50	4.25
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.17	1.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.17	1.17
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	1.50
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1.50
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	3.00	4.00	3.50	4.00	4.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	2.50
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	3.83	3.75
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	2.50	4.00	3.00	3.67	4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1.50	1.17
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	3.75	3.50		3.50	2.00	3.88	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	3.75
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.00	2.50	4.75	2.50
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	3.00	4.00	4.00	4.75
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	3.50
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	3.50	3.75	4.00	4.00	4.50	3.83	4.67
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	3.00	3.00		4.00	3.00	4.00

Response rate: 40% Responded 4 Eligible 10
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Obstetrics and Gynecology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	3.00	3.88	4.10	3.50	4.00	4.50
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	3.00	2.00	3.50	5.00		5.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	3.25	4.00	3.83	2.00	4.00	4.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2.75	3.00	2.50	3.50	3.00	2.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.50	2.50	2.50	3.00	2.00	4.50
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.00	3.00	2.17	3.00	4.00	4.00
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	1.50	1.83	1.83	2.50	3.00	2.50
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00	4.00	3.50	3.50	3.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.00	3.70	2.17	4.50	3.00	2.50
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1.17	1.50	1.12	1.50	1.00	1.50
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	1.50	2.00	2.00	2.00	1.00	2.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	4.00	2.50	2.50	3.50	3.00	1.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	1.17	2.00	1.25	1.50	2.00	1.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.50	2.50	1.75	4.00	4.00	2.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1.50	2.00	3.00	1.00	3.00	2.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.50	2.50	2.75	1.00	3.00	1.50
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.50	3.00	2.50	4.00	3.00	2.50
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.50	4.70	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	1.50	1.50	1.50	3.50	2.00	2.00
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.75	3.00
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.25	1.25
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	2.50
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	2.50
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	3.50	4.33	4.67	5.00	3.00	1.00	4.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3.83
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.17
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3.75	3.83	4.00	4.50	3.00	1.50	4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1.00	3.75
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	1.25	2.50	3.00	1.00	4.00	2.50
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	4.75
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.50	3.50	4.50	5.00	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	4.83
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	4.25	4.00	3.00	5.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	4.83
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	3.50	3.50	3.00	1.00	3.00	1.50	4.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	5.00	4.00	4.00

Response rate: 11% Responded 4 Eligible 37
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Ophthalmology and Visual Science

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2.00	4.83	4.75	4.25	4.88	4.50
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	4.00	3.50	4.00	2.25	3.00	4.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	4.50	5.00	4.50	3.50	4.75	4.25
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.00	4.83	3.00	3.00	4.83	4.50
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.00	4.67	4.50	4.12	4.67	4.50
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	4.00	4.88	4.17	4.00	4.33	4.00
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	3.00	3.00	2.00	3.00	3.00	3.75
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00	4.25	3.50	3.90	3.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.50	5.00	4.00	3.67	4.25	4.50
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1.50	2.75	2.50	2.50	2.50	4.25
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	2.75	4.00	3.50	3.50	3.50	4.75
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2.00	5.00	4.00	3.00	4.50	5.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.00	2.75	2.50	3.00	2.50	4.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.00	3.00	3.50	2.75	3.50	4.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.25		2.00	1.50	1.33	3.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2.25	2.00	2.00	1.38	1.33	3.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.75	4.75	4.25	4.00	3.00	4.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	2.17	2.50	3.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	2.00	4.00	3.50	3.67	3.75	4.17
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.00	2.00
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.38	1.33
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3.83
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1.75
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.17	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	2.50	3.50
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.50	5.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.62	4.50	4.75	4.50	4.00	4.00	3.50
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1.75	4.25
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	4.00	5.00	4.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.50
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	4.50
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.62	5.00	4.75	4.75	4.75
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	4.70
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	4.67
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.50	4.00	3.50
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	4.80
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.70	4.83	4.50	4.75	4.00	4.00	4.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.00	5.00	5.00	3.75	1.00	4.00

Response rate: 27% Responded 9 Eligible 33
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Orthopaedic Surgery

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	3.00	4.75	2.50	3.50	3.25
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	3.00	2.00		2.00	3.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.		2.50		2.00	4.00
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2.50	3.00	3.50	3.00	3.75
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.00	4.00	2.00	3.50	4.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	4.00	4.50	3.50	4.50	4.25
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	4.50	2.83	3.00	2.50	4.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00	4.17	3.50	4.50	4.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.00	4.00	3.50	4.00	1.25
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2.50	2.00	3.00	2.00	2.25
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	2.50	2.75	3.50	3.50	3.00
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	4.00	4.00		4.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.50	2.50	3.00	2.50	4.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.50	2.83	3.00	3.00	3.25
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.50	2.75	2.00	2.25	2.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.50	1.75	1.50	2.00	1.25
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	2.50	4.00	4.00	2.50	3.50
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.50	4.17	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	2.00	3.00	3.00	3.75	3.25
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	5.00	2.75
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	4.00	2.00
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	4.00
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	4.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	5.00	3.50	3.50	3.00	3.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	3.00	3.50
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	5.00	4.00	4.00	4.50	3.75
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1.00	2.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	3.50	3.00	3.00	4.00	4.00	3.00	3.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	1.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	4.50	5.00	4.75
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.75	5.00	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.75	3.00	5.00	4.75	3.50	3.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.00	5.00	5.00	4.50	5.00

Response rate: 11% Responded 2 Eligible 18
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Otolaryngology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	4.83	4.50	4.00		4.00	4.12
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	4.50	4.00	1.00		4.00	3.25
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	4.50	3.00	4.00	2.00	4.00	4.00
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.25	3.50	3.00	2.00	4.00	3.50
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.88	3.00	3.00	4.00	3.00	3.75
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.00	3.00	4.00	2.00	3.00	2.83
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	3.25	2.17	2.25		2.25	3.17
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00	4.00	3.75	4.00	4.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	4.00	3.50	3.25	2.00	4.75	3.25
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	3.00	2.00	3.00		3.50	1.75
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	4.67	3.25	4.00	2.00	4.75	3.00
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	4.83	4.00	4.50			3.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	4.00	3.00	4.00	2.00	3.50	3.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.75	3.25	3.75	2.00	3.75	3.17
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.00	1.33	1.25	1.00	2.00	2.75
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.33	1.33	1.25	1.00	1.50	2.75
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	4.75	3.50	4.50	2.00	4.00	3.50
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.67	4.00	3.75
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.75	3.00	3.25	3.00	3.50	3.50
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.50	2.25
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.25	2.00
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3.75
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	3.88
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.50	3.00	4.00		4.00	4.00	3.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	4.75
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.50	3.50
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.75	2.00	1.00	4.00	4.00	3.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	3.00	4.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.00	2.00		2.00	3.50	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.67	4.75	2.00	4.83
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	4.50
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	2.50	4.50	4.00	1.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	4.25
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.75	4.25	3.50		4.00	3.50	4.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.50	4.00	4.00		4.00	4.00

Response rate: 18% Responded 5 Eligible 28
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Pathology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	4.00	3.50	3.83	3.00	3.67	4.33
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	4.00	4.00	2.75	3.00	3.00	3.50
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	4.17	2.25	3.50	3.00	3.88	4.38
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.50	2.50	3.75	2.25	2.67	3.33
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	4.00	3.75	4.00	3.75	4.00	4.38
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.25	3.75	3.83	3.75	3.50	3.25
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	3.25	2.75	3.50	3.00	2.25	2.08
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00	4.00	4.17	3.75	3.83
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.25	2.00	3.50	2.75	2.83	3.12
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2.00	1.25	3.00	1.25	2.25	2.33
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.50	3.00	3.50	2.25	3.67	3.38
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	3.50	3.00	3.75	2.50	3.75	3.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.17	2.00	3.83	2.00	3.00	2.38
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	2.17	3.50	1.25	3.00	3.12
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	4.00	2.00	3.50	2.00	2.12	2.67
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2.50	1.50	3.00	1.50	2.00	2.67
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.50	3.00	4.00	2.50	3.12	3.33
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.83	3.50	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.00	1.25	3.00	1.25	2.17	3.00
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.00	1.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.00	1.50
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	4.00
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	3.17
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.70	2.00	3.50	2.25	3.50	3.25	3.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	4.17
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3.50	2.50	3.00	2.00	3.17	2.83	2.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.75
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	4.33	3.00	3.50	2.50	3.25	3.75
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.25	3.83	3.75	3.00	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	3.75
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	3.75	2.00	2.25	1.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.62	3.75	4.00	3.00	3.50	4.00	1.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	3.83	3.50	3.50	3.00	3.67	4.17

Response rate: 16% Responded 8 Eligible 50
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2	4	3	1	2	1	0	3.50	3.17	3.62	3.50	3.50	3.83
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2	1	2	1	2	0	5	3.00	1.88	2.75	3.00	1.00	3.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	1	3	1	0	1	0	7	3.83	3.00	3.70	3.67	4.25	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	1	1	3	3	5	0	0	2.00	2.33	2.17	2.83	3.00	3.33
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	1	1	3	2	5	1	0	2.00	2.25	3.50	3.17	3.25	3.67
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	0	6	2	2	1	2	0	3.58	2.25	3.80	3.75	3.67	3.67
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	1	1	2	3	5	1	0	1.83	2.10	2.33	2.00	2.12	2.75
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	3	6	1	2	1	0	0	3.92	3.50	4.08	3.80	3.75
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	0	2	3	4	4	0	0	2.12	2.75	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.25
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	0	1	2	3	7	0	0	1.43	2.00	1.40	1.75	2.25	2.75
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	0	2	3	3	5	0	0	2.00	2.62	2.50	3.50	2.75	3.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	0	2	3	1	3	3	1	2.67	2.25	3.00	3.50	4.00	3.25
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	2	3	1	7	0	0	1.43	2.17	2.25	2.25	2.50	2.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	0	1	3	1	8	0	0	1.31	2.50	2.62	2.50	3.67	3.50
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2	1	0	3	3	3	0	2.00	2.00	1.67	2.17	2.50	2.50
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	1	1	4	4	1	0	1.88	1.75	1.20	1.83	2.50	2.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	1	2	2	0	4	2	2	2.75	3.00	3.25	3.33	3.50	3.25
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	5	4	1	1	2	0	0	4.12	3.25	3.17
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	1	1	3	1	7	0	0	1.43	2.00	2.17	2.67	2.50	3.20
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1	2	2	1	6	0	0	1.50	2.33
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1	2	1	1	7	1	0	1.36	1.50
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	1	3	3	1	5	0	0	2.67
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1	2	2	2	6	0	0	1.75
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	1	4	3	2	0	2	0	3.50	3.58	3.62	3.67	3.50	2.75	3.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	2	2	3	2	1	1	2	3.17
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	0	8	3	1	0	1	0	3.75	3.50
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	1	5	2	1	0	2	0	3.80	3.17	3.80	3.67	3.50	2.50	4.17
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1	1	1	3	6	1	0	1.50	1.50
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	1	0	2	0	4	4	0	1.38	3.33	3.17	4.00	3.00	3.17	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	2	1	2	1	2	4	0	3.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	3	2	3	2	1	1	0	3.33	3.33	4.00	4.17	3.50
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	1	4	1	0	0	5	0	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	3	1	2	0	1	4	0	4.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	0	2	3	0	0	6	0	3.33
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	1	1	2	0	0	7	0	3.50	2.75	3.50	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	1	3	3	2	1	2	0	3.17
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	3	2	1	2	0	3	0	4.00	3.83	4.50	3.50	3.75	3.67	4.50
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	0	3	2	1	0	5	0	3.50	3.50	4.00	4.25	4.75	3.75

Response rate: 25% Responded 13 Eligible 52

Pharmacology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	4.00	4.30	3.80	3.70	3.33	3.80
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	3.83	4.00	3.00	3.88	3.50	2.33
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	4.00	4.00	3.33	4.00	3.83	4.12
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	4.25	4.25	4.00	4.17	3.92	3.38
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	4.25	4.38	4.12	3.75	3.81	3.90
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.00	3.67	3.00	2.50	3.71	1.83
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	2.75	2.50	3.00	3.75	3.88	2.25
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00	3.90	3.62	4.10	4.12
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	4.25	4.25	4.33	4.67	4.69	3.50
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	3.25	3.50	1.30	3.75	3.50	2.75
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	4.75	4.50	3.90	4.75	4.58	3.50
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.		4.83	3.75	4.50	3.88	4.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	3.75	2.25	3.83	3.67	2.75
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.25	3.88	3.00	3.88	3.67	2.75
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1.50	2.33	2.00	2.00	2.38	2.70
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.50	2.17	1.33	1.80	1.75	1.50
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.50	4.00	3.75	4.12	4.50	3.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.25	4.67	3.17
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.83	4.12	3.62	4.75	4.57	3.67
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.00	4.00
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1.50	3.75
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	4.00
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	4.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.93	4.00	3.88	4.25	3.75	3.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	3.75	4.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.67	4.00	4.17	4.50	3.50	1.25
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.		4.25
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.		4.50	5.00	4.00	4.00	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.33	4.00	4.67	3.83
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.50
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	2.50
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.		4.00	4.50	1.25
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	5.00	4.17	3.75	4.00	4.00	4.00	1.75
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	3.25	3.75	3.25	3.75	3.17	4.00

Response rate: 14% Responded 4 Eligible 29
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Psychiatry

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	3.00	3.80	4.17	3.70	3.75	3.83
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.		2.17	3.67	2.33	3.00	2.75
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	3.75	2.38	3.83	2.75	3.50	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.50	2.83	3.83	3.17	3.33	3.50
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.67	3.75	3.83	2.33	2.25	3.60
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.00	2.25	2.00	2.12	2.83	3.50
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	2.83	2.67	2.25	2.88	2.75	2.67
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.25	3.50	3.00	3.33	3.50
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.75	3.93	3.83	3.00	3.12	3.75
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	3.00	2.17	2.83	2.33	2.75	2.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.25	3.50	3.50	2.88	3.00	3.10
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	3.83	2.75	3.33	2.88	2.83	2.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.50	2.33	3.17	2.75	2.75	2.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.50	3.00	3.17	3.10	2.83	2.83
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.75	2.50	3.00	2.50	3.00	2.50
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2.75	2.50	2.17	2.30	2.88	1.75
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.50	3.25	3.12	3.00	3.00	3.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4.00	3.90	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.33	3.50	3.50	3.50	2.67	3.38
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.50	3.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.25	2.25
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3.75
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	3.67
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	3.67	3.88	4.00	2.50	3.33
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	4.50
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.50	3.75
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3.25	3.50	4.25	3.00	4.00	3.00	2.50
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	3.75	2.67
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	3.75	3.83	3.33	3.25	4.00	3.75	3.25
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	3.75
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.67	4.50	4.17	3.75	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	3.75
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.70	3.50	3.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	4.25
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.00	3.75	4.75	3.75	4.00	3.50	3.17
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	4.50	4.00	3.25	3.25	4.00	3.33

Response rate: 10% Responded 7 Eligible 67
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Radiation Oncology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	4.00	4.25	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.		2.00	3.00		3.50	2.50
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	4.00	2.50	4.00	4.00	3.00	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	4.00	3.75	4.00	4.00	3.50	3.00
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	4.50	3.50	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	4.50	3.17	3.50	3.00	3.50	3.00
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	4.50	2.50	2.50	3.00	3.00	3.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	5.00	4.17	4.75	3.00	4.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.00	3.50	4.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2.50	2.00	2.00	3.00	2.25	3.00
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.00	3.00	4.00	4.00	3.00	4.00
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2.50		4.00	3.00	4.00	3.00
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	2.75	3.00	3.00	2.00	3.00
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00	2.25	2.50	3.00	2.00	3.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	4.00	2.00	2.00	3.00	3.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	2.50	1.75	2.00	3.00	3.00
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	3.00	3.00
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4.50	4.00	3.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.50	2.25	3.75	4.00	2.00	4.00
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.50	2.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.50	2.50
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3.00
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	2.00
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00	3.75	4.00	4.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.00	4.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	5.00	4.00	4.00	3.00	4.50
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1.50	3.75
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	3.00	4.00	4.00	3.00	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	1.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.50	4.00	4.25	3.00	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	3.50
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	5.00	3.50	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	5.00
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	5.00	4.50	3.50	3.00	4.50
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.		4.00	4.00	3.00	4.00

Response rate: 10% Responded 2 Eligible 21
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Radiology

		AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	2.25	4.00	2.50	3.75	3.00	2.75
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	2.00	3.75	2.50	5.00	3.50	5.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	3.00	3.50	3.50	3.00	4.00	3.50
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.00	2.67	3.00	3.50	3.75	3.75
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	2.67	3.83	2.50	3.00	3.50	3.00
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	2.88	3.50	3.00	3.00	4.17	3.75
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	2.50	2.88	2.50	3.17	1.25	2.50
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00	3.75	3.50	4.00	4.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.50	3.50	2.50	4.00	4.00	3.83
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1.10	1.62	1.50	2.25	3.00	3.25
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.00	2.12	2.50	3.50	3.25	3.67
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2.50	2.75	2.00	3.25	3.25	3.75
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.25	2.25	2.00	2.62	3.00	2.33
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.75	2.75	2.17	2.50	3.00	3.25
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	2.75	1.30	1.25	2.17	1.17	2.25
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.38	1.33	1.25	2.00	1.17	1.50
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	3.00	4.50
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	3.25	3.12	3.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	2.75	2.40	2.50	3.20	3.25	3.88
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.00	1.62
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.00	1.14
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3.67
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	2.75
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	3.75	4.10	4.00	4.25	4.50	4.17	4.75
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3.12
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.50	4.00
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3.25	3.00	3.00	3.75	3.75	3.25	5.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	3.25	2.75
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	3.50	3.50	3.25	3.25	3.00	3.00	4.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	3.25
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.67	4.00	2.75	4.17	4.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.25
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	4.50
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	2.00	3.75	2.00	3.25
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	3.50
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.50	4.00	3.50	4.75	4.00	3.50	4.75
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	5.00	4.00	4.50	3.00	5.00	4.00

Response rate: 13% Responded 7 Eligible 55
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Surgery

		SA	A	N	D	SD	NBJ	NA	AY2020/21 median	AY2019/20 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	1	8	1	0	0	1	0	4.00	3.97	4.07	3.75	3.88	4.00
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	1	3	3	0	0	1	3	3.67	3.83	3.67	3.62	2.50	3.67
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	1	4	1	1	0	1	3	3.88	3.89	3.62	3.83	3.50	3.70
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	2	3	3	1	1	1	0	3.50	3.42	2.75	3.40	3.25	3.75
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	1	8	1	0	0	1	0	4.00	3.91	3.75	4.05	3.90	3.75
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	1	5	2	2	0	1	0	3.70	3.86	4.14	3.95	3.20	3.75
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	1	4	2	1	2	1	0	3.50	3.38	2.75	3.67	2.62	3.00
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	2	2	4	2	0	1	0	3.25	3.67	4.00	3.75	3.60
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	2	4	1	2	1	1	0	3.75	3.62	3.70	3.90	3.50	4.00
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	1	2	5	0	2	1	0	3.10	2.36	1.50	2.60	2.20	3.20
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	1	5	3	2	0	0	0	3.60	3.50	3.00	3.85	3.50	3.70
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2	2	2	1	1	2	1	3.50	3.00	3.00	3.70	3.00	3.50
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	1	2	5	2	1	0	0	3.00	3.00	2.67	3.25	2.25	3.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	1	3	5	2	0	0	0	3.20	2.94	2.67	3.29	2.75	3.70
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1	1	5	1	0	2	0	3.10	2.75	3.00	2.33	2.62	2.00
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1	2	4	0	2	1	0	3.12	2.28	2.50	2.00	2.25	2.50
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	1	3	3	1	0	2	0	3.50	3.50	3.00	3.50	3.30	3.30
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	2	4	4	0	1	0	0	3.62	4.04	3.75
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	1	3	4	2	1	0	0	3.12	2.93	3.00	3.61	3.20	3.70
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	1	2	3	1	2	2	0	3.00	2.42
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	0	3	2	0	3	3	0	3.00	1.94
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	1	3	2	3	2	0	0	2.75
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	1	4	2	1	3	0	0	3.25
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	3	4	2	0	0	1	0	4.12	4.06	4.50	3.93	3.62	4.33	3.83
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	3	4	1	1	1	1	0	4.00
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	1	4	2	1	1	2	0	3.62	3.93
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3	5	2	0	0	1	0	4.10	3.50	4.33	4.21	4.00	4.33	4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	1	4	3	1	2	0	0	3.33	4.00
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	1	4	2	0	1	2	1	3.75	3.67	4.00	3.38	3.25	3.50	3.30
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	1	2	5	2	1	0	0	3.00
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	3	7	0	0	0	0	1	4.21	4.00	4.33	3.90	4.14
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	2	2	2	0	1	3	1	3.75
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	2	3	2	0	0	3	1	4.00
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	2	4	2	1	0	2	0	3.88
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	5	6	0	0	0	0	0	4.42	4.33	4.50	4.33
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	3	1	2	0	0	4	1	4.50
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	3	7	0	0	0	1	0	4.21	4.20	3.83	4.30	4.50	4.57	4.17
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	1	4	1	0	0	4	1	4.00	3.17	3.00	3.38	3.33	3.67

Response rate: 14% Responded 11 Eligible 78

faculty with other affiliations

		AY2020/21 median	AY2018/19 median	AY2017/18 median	AY2016/17 median	AY2015/16 median	AY2014/15 median
Teaching
Q1	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our teaching mission.	3.75
Q2	The number of graduate student positions made available to my department is sufficient for our teaching needs.	3.00
Q3	Classroom resources in my department are sufficient for our teaching mission.	3.83
Q4	My dean actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence.	3.25
Research
Q5	The number of faculty in my department is sufficient to support our research mission.	3.75
Q6	The research space for my department is adequate to support our research mission.	3.88
Q7	The college/school provides adequate cost-sharing to support faculty research activities.	3.88
Q8	My college/school provides excellent support for research grant submission and management.	4.00
Q9	My dean actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence.	3.88
Environment
Q10	My dean consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions.	2.33
Q11	My dean promotes a collegial environment.	3.62
Q12	My dean employs fair procedures for resolving faculty grievances.	2.88
Q13	I am satisfied with the transparency of my school or college's administrative policies.	2.50
Q14	I am satisfied with the implementation of my school or college's administrative policies.	3.00
Q15	My dean employs too few support staff for the administrative needs of the school or college.	1.80
Q16	My dean appoints too few administrators for the needs of the school or college.	1.62
Q17	My dean supports and implements the Principles of Faculty Involvement in Institutional and Academic Unit Governance at the University of Michigan, Second Edition	3.25
Q18	My dean should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the college or school.	4.00
Q19	I have confidence in my dean's leadership overall.	3.17
Q20	My dean has involved faculty in planning decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	3.50
Q21	My dean has involved faculty in budget decisions for my college/school during the pandemic.	2.50
Q22	My dean has kept me well informed about developments affecting my college/school during the pandemic.	3.75
Q23	My dean has led the college/school well during the pandemic.	3.70
Associate Deans
Q24	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Research, Steve Kunkel is fully satisfactory.	4.25	4.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00
Q25	The performance of the Executive Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, David Miller is fully satisfactory.	4.90
Q26	The performance of the Interim Executive Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Brian Zink is fully satisfactory.	4.12
Q27	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Education and Global Initiatives, Joseph Kolars is fully satisfactory.	3.50	4.00	4.00	5.00		4.00
Q28	The performance of the Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Michael Mulholland is fully satisfactory.	4.75
Q29	The performance of the Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Steven Bernstein is fully satisfactory.	3.67	5.00	4.00	5.00
Q30	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, J. Sybil Biermann is fully satisfactory.	2.50
Q31	The performance of the Associate Dean for Health Equity and Inclusion, David Brown is fully satisfactory.	4.00	5.00	4.00	5.00
Q32	The performance of the Associate Dean for Physician Scientist Education and Training, Kathleen Collins is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q33	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Strategy, Teri Grieb is fully satisfactory.	3.83
Q34	The performance of the Associate Dean for Regulatory Affairs, Jacqueline Jeruss is fully satisfactory.	3.83
Q35	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research Information Technology, Sachin Kheterpal is fully satisfactory.	3.50	4.00	4.00
Q36	The performance of the Associate Dean for Research, Julie Lumeng is fully satisfactory.	4.00
Q37	The performance of the Associate Dean for Medical Student Education, Rajesh Mangrulkar is fully satisfactory.	4.38	5.00	4.00	5.00
Q38	The performance of the Associate Dean for Graduate and Post-doctoral Studies, Mary O'Riordan is fully satisfactory.	3.75	4.50	4.00	5.00

Response rate: 7% Responded 8 Eligible 120
Starting in 2017, counts on SA/A/N/D/SD/NBJ/NA are not displayed if fewer than ten responses were received, due to confidentiality concerns.

Notes on reporting

Back to AY2020/2021 results

Back to AEC home