2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4.62 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the Institute to senior administrators. | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.67 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous merit review process. | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.83 |
| Q7 | manages administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.67 |
| Q8 | manages the Institute's resources well. | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.94 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the Institute. | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.94 |
| Q10 | ensures that Institute policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.50 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.94 |