2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 10 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4.18 | 4.57 | 4.50 | 4.70 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 6 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3.88 | 4.04 | 4.21 | 4.17 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 3.00 | 3.75 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3.75 | 3.83 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 7 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 2.75 | 4.55 | 4.50 | 4.65 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 13 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4.54 | 4.67 | 4.67 | 4.81 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 10 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.18 | 4.62 | 4.65 | 4.66 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 15 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4.63 | 4.59 | 4.79 | 4.56 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 21 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.86 | 4.75 | 4.87 | 4.77 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3.60 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 8 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3.81 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.50 |