2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promote an environment for scholarly excellence. | 16 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4.33 | 4.23 | |||
| Q2 | consult the librarians adequately before making important decisions. | 3 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2.82 | 3.15 | |||
| Q3 | make excellent administrative appointments. | 6 | 20 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3.83 | 3.93 | |||
| Q4 | foster a fair and rigorous promotion process. | 3 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3.91 | 3.67 | |||
| Q5 | effectively represent the interests of the library to senior administrators. | 21 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.67 | 4.46 | |||
| Q6 | are attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the library. | 24 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.69 | 4.62 | |||
| Q7 | manage the library's resources well. | 13 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.07 | 3.78 | |||
| Q8 | successfully raise funds to support the mission of the library. | 12 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4.18 | 4.25 | |||
| Q9 | ensures that library policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all librarians. | 2 | 13 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3.17 | 3.10 | |||
| Q10 | inspire confidence in leadership overall. | 14 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4.13 | 4.28 |