2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.76 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.96 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the Residential College to senior administrators. | 23 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.93 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 19 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.84 |
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.90 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous merit review process. | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4.75 |
| Q7 | manages administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 16 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.69 |
| Q8 | manages the Residential College's resources well. | 19 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.82 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the Residential College. | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.91 |
| Q10 | ensures that Residential College policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 18 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.78 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.91 |