Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2018/19 median | AY2017/18 median | AY2016/17 median | AY2015/16 median | AY2014/15 median | AY2013/14 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 16 | 23 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3.70 | 3.57 | 3.62 | 3.69 | 3.94 | 4.33 |
| Q2 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the library. | 19 | 29 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 3.90 | 3.81 | 3.83 | 2.05 | 2.50 | 3.22 |
| Q3 | consults librarians adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 15 | 5 | 2.52 | 2.25 | 1.90 | 2.96 | 3.10 | 3.44 |
| Q4 | ensures that library policies, procedures, and available resources are transparent to all librarians. | 6 | 20 | 18 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 2.97 | 2.67 | 2.42 | 3.50 | 3.66 | 3.77 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 5 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 13 | 5 | 2.82 | 2.56 | 2.85 | 3.87 | 3.89 | 4.17 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion process. | 12 | 25 | 21 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3.62 | 3.73 | 3.48 | 3.78 | 3.85 | 4.43 |
| Q7 | effectively represents the interests of the library to senior administrators. | 16 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 3.53 | 3.81 | 3.54 | 3.37 | 3.64 | 3.89 |
| Q8 | manages the library's resources well. | 10 | 25 | 16 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 3.52 | 3.32 | 3.20 | 3.43 | 3.68 | 3.79 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the library. | 8 | 17 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 27 | 3.59 | 3.37 | 3.38 | 2.78 | 3.12 | 3.63 |
| Q10 | should increase efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across the campus. | 23 | 25 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 4.02 | |||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 4 | 15 | 22 | 13 | 18 | 1 | 2.73 | 2.77 | 2.60 | 2.71 | 3.56 | 3.95 |
| Q12 | The performance of the Associate Dean of Libraries, Donna Hayward, is fully satisfactory. | 16 | 16 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 3.30 | 3.44 |