2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 28 | 39 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 48 | 4.09 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 29 | 36 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 50 | 4.11 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 20 | 30 | 16 | 7 | 8 | 55 | 3.82 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 13 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 6 | 71 | 3.42 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 9 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 91 | 3.54 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 14 | 23 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 84 | 3.98 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 24 | 39 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 51 | 4.04 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 12 | 23 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 82 | 3.89 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 11 | 9 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 3.47 | ||
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 38 | 30 | 18 | 6 | 7 | 37 | 4.12 |