2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2.80 | 3.17 | 3.79 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2.20 | 2.83 | 3.33 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1.67 | 3.30 | 3.10 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2.10 | 2.90 | 3.25 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3.10 | 4.00 | 4.14 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2.50 | 3.50 | 4.12 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2.50 | 3.30 | 3.75 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 1.62 | 2.92 | 3.50 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1.44 | 3.00 | 2.88 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1.83 | 2.21 | 2.75 |