2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 23 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4.57 | 4.50 | 4.70 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 15 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4.04 | 4.21 | 4.17 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 11 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 3.75 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 14 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 3.83 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 21 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 4.55 | 4.50 | 4.65 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 23 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4.67 | 4.67 | 4.81 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 24 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4.62 | 4.65 | 4.66 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 23 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4.59 | 4.79 | 4.56 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 26 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4.75 | 4.87 | 4.77 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 18 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.50 |