2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 23 | 50 | 21 | 22 | 15 | 4 | 3.65 | 3.68 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 22 | 54 | 22 | 19 | 15 | 3 | 3.69 | 3.57 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 31 | 27 | 21 | 35 | 16 | 2.63 | 1.98 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 11 | 28 | 43 | 20 | 22 | 11 | 2.97 | 2.69 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 21 | 54 | 16 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 3.83 | 3.32 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 29 | 47 | 22 | 20 | 15 | 2 | 3.70 | 3.51 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 11 | 35 | 23 | 18 | 19 | 29 | 3.20 | 3.06 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 16 | 46 | 26 | 18 | 27 | 2 | 3.33 | 2.78 |