2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 19 | 28 | 10 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 3.82 | 3.45 | 3.53 | 3.68 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 18 | 30 | 11 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 3.80 | 3.32 | 3.27 | 3.62 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 11 | 18 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 3.12 | 2.34 | 2.44 | 2.38 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 10 | 25 | 13 | 9 | 9 | 13 | 3.58 | 3.05 | 3.08 | 2.98 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 16 | 12 | 16 | 11 | 6 | 18 | 3.34 | 3.50 | 3.48 | 3.47 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 8 | 20 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 14 | 3.12 | 2.46 | 2.62 | 2.43 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 11 | 27 | 13 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 3.56 | 3.00 | 2.90 | 3.33 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 9 | 28 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 3.62 | 2.77 | 2.48 | 2.68 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 4 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 7 | 31 | 2.96 | 2.77 | 2.72 | 2.77 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 11 | 24 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 3.38 | 2.86 | 2.73 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 12 | 22 | 18 | 10 | 13 | 3 | 3.31 | 2.92 | 2.53 | 2.91 |