Administration Evaluation
Administration Evaluation
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | AY2013/14 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promote an environment for scholarly excellence. | 16 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4.33 |
| Q2 | consult the librarians adequately before making important decisions. | 3 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 3.22 |
| Q3 | make excellent administrative appointments. | 6 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 15 | 3.44 |
| Q4 | foster a fair and rigorous promotion process. | 2 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 28 | 3.77 |
| Q5 | effectively represent the interests of the library to senior administrators. | 12 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 4.17 |
| Q6 | are attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the library. | 20 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4.43 |
| Q7 | manage the library's resources well. | 8 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 3.89 |
| Q8 | successfully raise funds to support the mission of the library. | 4 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 3.79 |
| Q9 | ensures that library policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all librarians. | 7 | 15 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 3.63 |
| Q10 | inspire confidence in leadership overall. | 16 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3.95 |
| Q11 | In the current economic downturn, a wage or hiring freeze is preferable to layoffs within the library system. | 12 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 3.55 |