2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.38 | 4.20 | 3.83 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 2 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.94 | 3.88 | 3.50 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.10 | 3.83 | 3.67 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.57 | 4.17 | 4.50 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4.00 | 3.88 | 3.50 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.40 | 4.17 | 4.17 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3.79 | 3.50 | 4.00 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3.50 | 3.75 | 3.75 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.12 | 4.12 | 4.00 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.70 | 4.33 | 3.83 |