2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 6 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4.11 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 5 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3.86 | ||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4.30 | ||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3.95 | ||
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 3.10 | ||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4.10 | ||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 5 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4.14 | ||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3.83 | ||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 7 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.14 | ||
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 4 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.89 |