2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 17 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.21 | 4.38 | 4.44 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 6 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3.62 | 3.82 | 3.81 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 14 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4.04 | 4.17 | 4.20 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 2 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 3.04 | 3.23 | 3.44 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 4 | 15 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 3.34 | 3.38 | 3.70 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 12 | 23 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4.04 | 4.12 | 4.14 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 6 | 17 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 3.59 | 3.58 | 3.56 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 10 | 21 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3.86 | 4.00 | 3.71 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 15 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4.00 | 4.08 | 4.10 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 11 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 3.33 | 4.00 | 3.94 |