2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 3.25 | 3.17 | 3.70 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 9 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 3.62 | 3.67 | 3.29 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 13 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3.88 | 4.00 | 3.30 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 13 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3.80 | 3.73 | 3.71 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 6 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 3.06 | 3.05 | 2.57 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 10 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 3.81 | 4.12 | 3.83 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 7 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3.89 | 3.50 | 3.64 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3.79 | 3.71 | 3.14 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 10 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 3.81 | 3.50 | 2.85 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 2.60 | 3.00 | 3.00 |