2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 31 | 38 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 60 | 3.97 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 39 | 34 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 62 | 4.18 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 21 | 26 | 24 | 12 | 3 | 76 | 3.65 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 16 | 29 | 21 | 9 | 5 | 82 | 3.67 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 19 | 30 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 89 | 3.92 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 23 | 32 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 80 | 3.95 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 32 | 29 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 71 | 4.03 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 21 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 89 | 3.80 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 13 | 21 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 102 | 3.69 | ||
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 34 | 34 | 24 | 12 | 7 | 49 | 3.87 |