2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 8 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3.79 | 4.32 | 4.05 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 9 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.19 | 4.07 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 3 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3.40 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 1 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 2.36 | 3.68 | 3.30 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 4 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3.50 | 3.90 | 4.12 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 13 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4.25 | 4.50 | 4.20 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 4 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3.11 | 3.77 | 3.95 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 5 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3.79 | 4.00 | 3.92 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 4 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 3.54 | 4.28 | 4.21 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 4 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 3.25 | 4.00 | 3.75 |