2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 18 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 4.50 | 4.58 | 4.43 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 12 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4.04 | 4.33 | 4.54 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 3.71 | 4.50 | 4.33 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 12 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4.15 | 3.88 | 4.25 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 7 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 3.56 | 4.00 | 3.92 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 11 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 3.93 | 4.43 | 4.10 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 7 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 3.79 | 4.28 | 4.21 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 11 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 4.15 | 4.00 | 4.33 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 13 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4.06 | 4.00 | 4.30 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 10 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3.72 | 4.08 | 4.25 |