2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | ||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | ||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | ||
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | ||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | ||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | ||
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 |