2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 20 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4.33 | 4.53 | 4.09 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 19 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4.27 | 4.53 | 4.04 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 15 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3.90 | 3.00 | 3.33 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 12 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3.71 | 2.58 | 2.75 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 11 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 3.96 | 3.83 | 3.95 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 17 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4.59 | 4.14 | 4.19 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 22 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4.45 | 4.18 | 4.31 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 19 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4.35 | 4.25 | 4.12 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 30 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.78 | 4.85 | 4.92 |
| Q10 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 16 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 4.10 | 3.56 | 3.71 |