2006 evaluation results
2006 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2006 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 25 | 61 | 28 | 24 | 12 | 6 | 3.68 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 16 | 64 | 26 | 30 | 15 | 5 | 3.57 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 2 | 26 | 20 | 44 | 50 | 13 | 1.98 |
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 3 | 31 | 44 | 32 | 29 | 16 | 2.69 |
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 12 | 46 | 34 | 17 | 19 | 27 | 3.32 |
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 20 | 54 | 26 | 25 | 22 | 9 | 3.51 |
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 5 | 38 | 36 | 18 | 21 | 37 | 3.06 |
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 12 | 43 | 29 | 25 | 43 | 5 | 2.78 |