2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 4 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3.38 | 4.00 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 3 | 9 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3.25 | 4.00 | ||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 2 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 3.10 | 4.50 | ||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 5 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3.60 | 4.25 | ||
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3.33 | 3.50 | ||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 7 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 3.38 | 4.33 | ||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 3 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3.50 | 4.12 | ||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 3 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3.62 | 4.25 | ||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 3 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 3.12 | 4.10 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 4 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.67 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 2 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 3.00 | 3.62 |