2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.70 | 4.21 | 4.50 | 4.50 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.61 | 3.70 | 3.50 | 4.67 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.92 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.79 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.82 | 3.60 | 4.00 | 4.67 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.75 | 3.80 | 3.50 | 4.38 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.82 | 3.43 | 4.17 | 4.80 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.88 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 4.75 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.92 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.60 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.92 | 4.58 | 4.50 | 4.88 |
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.83 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.88 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.50 |