2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 11 | 16 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3.88 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 8 | 21 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3.90 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 7 | 10 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 14 | 3.50 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 11 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 11 | 3.45 |
| Q5 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 7 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 3.85 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 8 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 3.65 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 6 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 3.50 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 7 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 3.79 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 4 | 15 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 3.53 |
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 6 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3.45 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 9 | 17 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3.79 |