2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promote an environment for scholarly excellence. | 15 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4.23 |
| Q2 | consult the librarians adequately before making important decisions. | 3 | 13 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 3.15 |
| Q3 | make excellent administrative appointments. | 11 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 3.93 |
| Q4 | foster a fair and rigorous promotion process. | 6 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 3.67 |
| Q5 | effectively represent the interests of the library to senior administrators. | 17 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4.46 |
| Q6 | are attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the library. | 21 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.62 |
| Q7 | manage the library's resources well. | 11 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3.78 |
| Q8 | successfully raise funds to support the mission of the library. | 10 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4.25 |
| Q9 | ensures that library policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all librarians. | 3 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3.10 |
| Q10 | inspire confidence in leadership overall. | 17 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4.28 |