2007 evaluation results
2007 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 18 | 36 | 18 | 20 | 13 | 0 | 3.54 | 3.62 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 18 | 42 | 16 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 3.68 | 3.57 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 4 | 23 | 20 | 20 | 29 | 9 | 2.45 | 1.95 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 9 | 20 | 35 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 2.91 | 2.62 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 16 | 44 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 3.82 | 3.25 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 23 | 34 | 18 | 18 | 12 | 0 | 3.63 | 3.43 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 9 | 25 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 21 | 3.00 | 2.96 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 11 | 37 | 18 | 16 | 22 | 1 | 3.28 | 2.57 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 5 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3.93 | 3.83 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 4 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3.71 | 3.57 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 3.14 | 2.04 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 2 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3.19 | 2.88 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 5 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 3.90 | 3.50 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 6 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3.88 | 3.62 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 2 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3.60 | 3.25 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 5 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3.44 | 3.43 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 9 | 28 | 9 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 3.61 | 3.73 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 8 | 27 | 9 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 3.54 | 3.39 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 1 | 14 | 16 | 11 | 20 | 9 | 2.50 | 1.80 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 4 | 15 | 26 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 2.98 | 2.65 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 9 | 30 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 3.85 | 3.55 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 15 | 26 | 14 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 3.73 | 3.64 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 6 | 20 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 19 | 3.50 | 3.38 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 5 | 28 | 14 | 8 | 15 | 1 | 3.36 | 2.79 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 3 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3.57 | 3.19 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 3 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.85 | 3.79 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2.38 | 2.38 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2.33 | 2.75 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 4 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3.81 | 2.33 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3.00 | 2.60 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2.12 | 2.86 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 1 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 3.25 | 2.71 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.67 | 4.17 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.67 | 3.90 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3.00 | 3.00 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3.50 | 3.33 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.50 | 4.00 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.67 | 4.00 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.00 | 3.17 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.25 | 3.75 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.25 | 3.90 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.08 | 3.64 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3.00 | 2.00 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.25 | 2.50 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.14 | 3.00 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.17 | 3.17 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3.83 | 2.90 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3.90 | 2.50 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3.30 | 3.00 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 5 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3.69 | 3.38 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2.88 | 1.88 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent administrative appointments. | 2 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3.08 | 2.67 | ||
| Q5 | effectively represents the interests of the campus to the President, Regents and state officials. | 3 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3.57 | 3.67 | ||
| Q6 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the campus. | 5 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3.57 | 3.38 | ||
| Q7 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the campus. | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2.67 | 2.40 | ||
| Q8 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2.92 | 2.62 |