2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 16 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4.69 | 4.71 | 4.68 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 16 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.69 | 4.64 | 4.72 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 10 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4.07 | 4.71 | 4.72 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 14 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.57 | 4.55 | 4.00 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 16 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4.75 | 4.60 | 4.64 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 19 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.84 | 5.00 | 4.88 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 18 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.78 | 4.77 | 4.80 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 15 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.63 | 4.55 | 4.66 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 20 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.85 | 4.82 | 4.84 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 10 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4.12 | 4.42 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 16 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.69 | 4.82 | 4.83 |
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.92 | 4.94 | 4.80 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.86 | 4.79 | 4.62 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.57 | 4.92 | 4.67 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.57 | 4.67 | 4.20 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4.58 | 5.00 | 4.00 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.92 | 4.92 | 4.50 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.92 | 4.94 | 4.80 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.80 | 5.00 | 4.75 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 11 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.86 | 5.00 | 4.75 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.42 | 4.94 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.80 | 4.94 | 4.62 |