2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 30 | 44 | 16 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 3.94 | 3.83 | 4.09 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 28 | 52 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 3.99 | 3.86 | 4.11 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 20 | 30 | 18 | 17 | 14 | 14 | 3.52 | 3.39 | 3.82 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 13 | 41 | 17 | 14 | 16 | 12 | 3.59 | 3.14 | 3.42 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 27 | 36 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 24 | 4.01 | 3.75 | 3.54 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 28 | 26 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 35 | 4.08 | 3.92 | 3.98 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 33 | 34 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 7 | 3.90 | 3.86 | 4.04 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 24 | 38 | 17 | 13 | 8 | 14 | 3.82 | 3.63 | 3.89 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 15 | 38 | 13 | 12 | 4 | 32 | 3.82 | 3.54 | 3.47 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 17 | 32 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 3.44 | 3.50 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 30 | 41 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 3.89 | 3.82 | 4.12 |