2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 35 | 78 | 35 | 18 | 12 | 7 | 3.81 | 3.96 | 3.97 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 34 | 73 | 45 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 3.77 | 4.04 | 4.18 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 22 | 53 | 45 | 38 | 15 | 12 | 3.24 | 3.59 | 3.65 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 27 | 60 | 45 | 27 | 13 | 13 | 3.52 | 3.62 | 3.67 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 28 | 71 | 42 | 13 | 10 | 20 | 3.74 | 3.83 | 3.92 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 35 | 59 | 44 | 9 | 10 | 28 | 3.76 | 3.82 | 3.95 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 42 | 72 | 20 | 22 | 12 | 16 | 3.92 | 4.05 | 4.03 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 29 | 66 | 37 | 21 | 7 | 25 | 3.73 | 3.81 | 3.80 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 30 | 52 | 38 | 13 | 5 | 45 | 3.75 | 3.70 | 3.69 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 25 | 50 | 45 | 31 | 11 | 22 | 3.37 | 3.54 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 32 | 65 | 42 | 21 | 15 | 7 | 3.65 | 3.83 | 3.87 |