2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 12 | 16 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 3.69 | 3.66 | 3.70 | 4.12 | |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 10 | 15 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 3.53 | 3.42 | 3.75 | 4.19 | |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 3.15 | 3.62 | 3.44 | 4.25 | |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 8 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 2.96 | 2.96 | 3.77 | 3.75 | |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 11 | 16 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 3.94 | 3.59 | 3.66 | 4.17 | |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 14 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 3.72 | 3.80 | 4.17 | 4.38 | |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 13 | 15 | 3 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 3.70 | 3.90 | 4.13 | 4.59 | |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 7 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 2.64 | 3.21 | 3.71 | 4.00 | |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 5 | 14 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 3.35 | 3.56 | 3.88 | 3.75 | |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 2.94 | 3.54 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 7 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 1 | 2.80 | 3.11 | 3.54 | 4.18 |