2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 13 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.24 | 4.35 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 11 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4.05 | 4.15 | 4.10 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 8 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3.65 | 3.50 | 4.28 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 9 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3.62 | 3.20 | 2.67 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 8 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3.90 | 3.07 | 3.12 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 17 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4.65 | 4.17 | 4.38 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 18 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4.58 | 4.55 | 4.45 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 16 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4.50 | 4.38 | 4.33 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 13 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4.38 | 4.56 | 3.12 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 8 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3.31 | 3.73 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 11 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4.08 | 3.95 | 4.30 |