2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 6 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 3.55 | 3.97 | 3.79 | 4.32 | 4.05 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 9 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3.86 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.19 | 4.07 |
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 6 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 3.00 | 3.73 | 3.40 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 1 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 2.17 | 2.75 | 2.36 | 3.68 | 3.30 |
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 4 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3.04 | 3.68 | 3.50 | 3.90 | 4.12 |
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 7 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3.92 | 4.38 | 4.25 | 4.50 | 4.20 |
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 2 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3.66 | 3.83 | 3.11 | 3.77 | 3.95 |
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 8 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 3.61 | 3.57 | 3.79 | 4.00 | 3.92 |
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 2.67 | 3.50 | 3.54 | 4.28 | 4.21 |
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 2 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 1 | 2.30 | 3.58 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 4 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 3.08 | 3.60 | 3.25 | 4.00 | 3.75 |