2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 12 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4.05 | 4.56 | 4.33 | 4.53 | 4.09 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 12 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4.12 | 4.53 | 4.27 | 4.53 | 4.04 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3.43 | 3.68 | 3.90 | 3.00 | 3.33 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 11 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4.05 | 3.42 | 3.71 | 2.58 | 2.75 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 8 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 3.81 | 3.96 | 3.96 | 3.83 | 3.95 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 10 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4.17 | 4.43 | 4.59 | 4.14 | 4.19 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 16 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 4.42 | 4.53 | 4.45 | 4.18 | 4.31 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 14 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4.20 | 4.25 | 4.35 | 4.25 | 4.12 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 21 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.71 | 4.77 | 4.78 | 4.85 | 4.92 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 7 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3.77 | 3.33 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 11 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3.90 | 4.14 | 4.10 | 3.56 | 3.71 |