2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4.61 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 7 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4.44 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4.70 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4.75 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4.79 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4.81 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4.79 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4.67 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4.50 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4.70 |
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.71 |