2008 evaluation results
2008 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 5 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3.86 | 4.60 | 4.09 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 5 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3.86 | 4.50 | 3.85 | ||
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2.50 | 3.75 | 3.80 | ||
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2.25 | 3.12 | 3.50 | ||
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3.71 | 4.33 | 4.07 | ||
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3.75 | 4.50 | 3.62 | ||
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 5 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3.86 | 4.20 | 4.22 | ||
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3.17 | 3.90 | 3.80 | ||
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2.42 | 3.88 | 3.60 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 3.60 | 3.50 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3.33 | 4.50 | 3.92 |