2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 8 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.07 | 4.29 | 4.00 | 3.92 | 4.33 | 4.33 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 7 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 3.60 | 3.62 | 3.25 | 3.25 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2.75 | 2.62 | 2.30 | 2.62 | 2.60 | 2.60 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 5 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3.81 | 3.75 | 3.00 | 3.70 | 3.83 | 3.83 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3.90 | 4.17 | 3.83 | 3.88 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 12 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4.67 | 4.83 | 4.08 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.30 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 12 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.62 | 4.69 | 4.00 | 3.90 | 4.55 | 4.55 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 5 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3.95 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 2.00 | 2.25 | 2.25 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 11 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4.59 | 4.57 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.21 | 4.21 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.75 | 3.70 | 3.58 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 8 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3.92 | 4.33 | 3.60 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 3.00 |