2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3.00 | 4.12 | 3.86 | 4.11 | ||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 3.25 | 3.86 | ||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1.21 | 3.00 | 2.40 | 4.30 | ||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1.36 | 2.62 | 2.38 | 3.95 | ||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1.21 | 2.75 | 2.83 | 3.10 | ||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2.25 | 3.67 | 3.20 | 4.10 | ||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2.25 | 3.60 | 2.75 | 4.14 | ||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1.50 | 3.33 | 2.25 | 3.83 | ||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2.25 | 4.00 | 3.17 | 4.14 | ||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2.00 | 3.67 | 3.81 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1.36 | 2.38 | 2.25 | 3.89 |