2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 24 | 16 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4.47 | 4.32 | 4.22 | 4.20 | 4.50 | 4.50 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 14 | 13 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3.73 | 3.58 | 3.55 | 3.62 | 3.80 | 3.80 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 7 | 15 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 3.21 | 3.10 | 3.14 | 3.59 | 2.75 | 2.75 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 8 | 17 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 3.56 | 3.06 | 2.97 | 3.25 | 3.08 | 3.08 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 16 | 15 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4.00 | 3.85 | 3.72 | 3.62 | 3.85 | 3.85 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 12 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3.94 | 3.88 | 3.81 | 3.89 | 3.88 | 3.88 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 14 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3.91 | 3.94 | 3.73 | 4.05 | 3.95 | 3.95 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 7 | 10 | 11 | 7 | 13 | 1 | 2.86 | 2.79 | 2.92 | 2.95 | 2.42 | 2.42 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 11 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 3.67 | 3.46 | 3.32 | 3.50 | 3.44 | 3.44 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 10 | 17 | 2 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 3.68 | 3.36 | 3.25 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 12 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 3.33 | 3.22 | 3.25 | 3.53 | 3.50 | 3.50 |