2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 18 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.64 | 4.79 | 4.81 | 4.70 | 4.84 | 4.84 |
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 20 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.72 | 4.76 | 4.69 | 4.70 | 4.75 | 4.75 |
| Q3 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 15 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4.46 | 4.29 | 4.78 | 4.71 | 4.92 | 4.92 |
| Q4 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 15 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4.53 | 4.57 | 4.59 | 4.06 | 4.75 | 4.75 |
| Q5 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 14 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4.64 | 4.70 | 4.73 | 4.59 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Q6 | effectively represents the interests of the college / school to senior administrators. | 22 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4.86 | 4.87 | 4.98 | 4.83 | 4.87 | 4.87 |
| Q7 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the college / school. | 24 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.83 | 4.84 | 4.80 | 4.95 | 4.95 |
| Q8 | manages the college's / schools's resources well. | 18 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4.75 | 4.70 | 4.74 | 4.67 | 4.91 | 4.91 |
| Q9 | successfully raises funds to support the mission of the college / school. | 24 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.85 | 4.85 | 4.88 | 4.83 | 4.83 | 4.83 |
| Q10 | ensures that unit policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 16 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.53 | 4.25 | 4.68 | |||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 23 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.73 | 4.86 | 4.80 | 4.92 | 4.92 |