2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | The new web-based student evaluation of instructors is an improvement over paper-based evaluations. | 91 | 160 | 119 | 108 | 117 | 181 | 3.11 |
| Q2 | U-M athletes in all sports should receive rigorous supervision of their academic choices by the faculty. | 286 | 256 | 106 | 34 | 18 | 83 | 4.25 |
| Q3 | The U-M football program enhances the academic reputation of the University. | 48 | 131 | 192 | 188 | 189 | 36 | 2.48 |
| Q4 | Classroom doors should be lockable from the inside in the event of an active shooter on campus. | 134 | 234 | 186 | 96 | 53 | 74 | 3.57 |
| Q5 | Proposed new faculty grievance procedures are an improvement over existing practices. http://www.umich.edu/~sacua/sacmin/faculgrievancepolicytaskforce08.pdf | 31 | 111 | 198 | 9 | 9 | 407 | 3.31 |
| Q6 | I support the proposed requirement of continuous enrollment for Ph. D. students. http://www.rackham.umich.edu/policies/continuous_enrollment/continuous_enrollment_policy/ | 65 | 172 | 114 | 114 | 167 | 142 | 2.81 |
| Q7 | A penalty of no less than 20% of candidate tuition should be assessed for every semester that a student fails to register without permission from Rackham. | 21 | 95 | 133 | 147 | 185 | 193 | 2.22 |
| Q8 | A re-registration fee of no more than $100 is all that should be assessed when a student returns from an absence not endorsed by Rackham. | 113 | 220 | 138 | 68 | 46 | 185 | 3.68 |
| Q9 | Tuition should not continue to be charged for enrolled doctoral students who have completed required coursework and have met minimum Rackham tuition credit hour requirements (Required Fee Total). http://www.rackham.umich.edu/policies/gsh/section2/ | 237 | 235 | 94 | 71 | 22 | 116 | 4.11 |
| Q10 | There should be a tuition reduction program for children of faculty. | 403 | 185 | 80 | 46 | 57 | 16 | 4.54 |