2009 evaluation results

General Administration Issues

combined report for all faculty

Q1The new web-based student evaluation of instructors is an improvement over paper-based evaluations. 911601191081171813.11
Q2U-M athletes in all sports should receive rigorous supervision of their academic choices by the faculty.2862561063418834.25
Q3The U-M football program enhances the academic reputation of the University.48131192188189362.48
Q4Classroom doors should be lockable from the inside in the event of an active shooter on campus.1342341869653743.57
Q5Proposed new faculty grievance procedures are an improvement over existing practices.   http://www.umich.edu/~sacua/sacmin/faculgrievancepolicytaskforce08.pdf31111198994073.31
Q6I support the proposed requirement of continuous enrollment for Ph. D. students.   http://www.rackham.umich.edu/policies/continuous_enrollment/continuous_enrollment_policy/651721141141671422.81
Q7A penalty of no less than 20% of candidate tuition should be assessed for every semester that a student fails to register without permission from Rackham.21951331471851932.22
Q8A re-registration fee of no more than $100 is all that should be assessed when a student returns from an absence not endorsed by Rackham.11322013868461853.68
Q9Tuition should not continue to be charged for enrolled doctoral students who have completed required coursework and have met minimum Rackham tuition credit hour requirements (Required Fee Total).   http://www.rackham.umich.edu/policies/gsh/section2/2372359471221164.11
Q10There should be a tuition reduction program for children of faculty.403185804657164.54
Response rate: 17%     Responded 790     Eligible 4695     (3343 Senate, 1352 non-Senate)
Separate reports by faculty groups

Notes on reporting

Back to 2009 results

Back to AEC home