2009 evaluation results
2009 evaluation results
| SA | A | N | D | SD | NBJ | 2009 median | 2008 median | 2007 median | 2006 median | 2005* median | 2004* median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | actively promotes an environment for scholarly excellence. | 13 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.54 | 4.06 | ||||
| Q2 | actively promotes an environment for teaching excellence. | 15 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.67 | 4.70 | ||||
| Q3 | effectively represents the interests of the department to senior administrators. | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4.68 | 4.00 | ||||
| Q4 | consults the faculty adequately before making important decisions. | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4.38 | 3.83 | ||||
| Q5 | makes excellent faculty administrative appointments. | 10 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4.50 | 3.50 | ||||
| Q6 | fosters a fair and rigorous promotion and tenure process. | 13 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4.62 | 3.88 | ||||
| Q7 | manages departmental administrative staff well, including maintaining appropriate staffing levels. | 10 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.29 | 3.50 | ||||
| Q8 | manages the department's resources well. | 11 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4.50 | 3.90 | ||||
| Q9 | is attentive to long-term, strategic issues that affect the department. | 11 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4.55 | 3.80 | ||||
| Q10 | ensures that departmental policies, procedures and available resources are transparent to all faculty. | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4.40 | 3.80 | ||||
| Q11 | inspires confidence in leadership overall. | 15 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4.67 | 3.90 |